fMRI Spots More Lies in First Controlled Comparison of the Two Technologies
When it comes to lying, our brains are much more likely to give us away than sweaty palms or spikes in heart rate, new evidence from researchers in the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania suggests. The study, published in the Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, found that scanning people’s brains with fMRI, or functional magnetic resonance imaging, was significantly more effective at spotting lies than a traditional polygraph test.
It has been demonstrated that when someone is lying, areas of the brain linked to decision-making are activated, which lights up on an fMRI scan for experts to see. While laboratory studies showed fMRI’s ability to detect deception with up to 90 percent accuracy, estimates of polygraphs’ accuracy ranged wildly, between chance and 100 percent, depending on the study. The Penn study was the first to compare the two modalities in the same individuals in a blinded and prospective fashion. The approach adds scientific data to the long-standing debate about this technology and builds the case for more studies investigating its potential real-life applications, such as evidence in the criminal legal proceedings.
Researchers from Penn’s departments of Psychiatry and Biostatistics and Epidemiology found that neuroscience experts without prior experience in lie detection, using fMRI data, were 24 percent more likely to detect deception than professional polygraph examiners reviewing polygraph recordings. In both fMRI and polygraph, participants took a standardized “concealed information” test.
Polygraph, the only physiological lie detector in worldwide use since it was introduced in its present form more than 50 years ago, monitors individuals’ electrical skin conductivity, heart rate, and respiration during a series of questions. Polygraph is based on the assumption that incidents of lying are marked by upward or downward spikes in these measurements. Despite having been deemed inadmissible as legal evidence in most jurisdictions in the United States or for pre-employment screening in the private sector for almost 30 years, polygraph is widely used for government background checks and security clearances.
“Polygraph measures reflect complex activity of the peripheral nervous system that is reduced to only a few parameters, while fMRI is looking at thousands of brain clusters with higher resolution in both space and time. While neither type of activity is unique to lying, we expected brain activity to be a more specific marker, and this is what I believe we found,” said the study’s lead author, Daniel D. Langleben, MD, a professor of Psychiatry.
To compare the two technologies, 28 participants were given the so-called “Concealed Information Test” (CIT). CIT is designed to determine whether a person has specific knowledge by asking carefully constructed questions, some of which have known answers, and looking for responses that are accompanied by spikes in physiological activity. Sometimes referred to as the Guilty Knowledge Test, CIT has been developed and used by polygraph examiners to demonstrate the effectiveness of their methods to subjects prior to the actual polygraph examination.
In the Penn study, a polygraph examiner asked participants to secretly write down a number between three and eight. Next, each person was administered the CIT while either hooked to a polygraph or lying inside an MRI scanner. Each of the participants had both tests, in a different order, a few hours apart. During both sessions, they were instructed to answer “no” to questions about all the numbers, making one of the six answers a lie. The results were then evaluated by three polygraph and three neuroimaging experts separately and then compared to determine which technology was better at detecting the fib.
In one example in the paper, fMRI clearly shows increased brain activity when a participant, who picked the number seven, is asked if that is their number. Experts who studied the polygraph counterpart incorrectly identified the number six as the lie. The polygraph associated with the number six shows high peaks after the participant is asked the same questions several times in a row, suggesting that answer was a lie. The scenario was reversed in another example, as neither fMRI nor polygraph experts were perfect, which is demonstrated in the paper. However, overall, fMRI experts were 24 percent more likely to detect the lie in any given participant.
Beyond the accuracy comparison, authors made another important observation. In the 17 cases when polygraph and fMRI agreed on what the concealed number was, they were 100 percent correct. Such high precision of positive determinations could be especially important in the United States and British criminal proceedings, where avoiding false convictions takes absolute precedence over catching the guilty, the authors said. They cautioned that while this does suggest that the two modalities may be complementary if used in sequence, their study was not designed to test combined use of both modalities and their unexpected observation needs to be confirmed experimentally before any practical conclusions could be made.
The Latest on: Lie detection
via Google News
The Latest on: Lie detection
- Gnosia review: A single-player impostor game that still brings the dramaon March 5, 2021 at 1:55 pm
When I first heard about Gnosia, a single-player version of the traditional impostor social game, I wondered how it would capture that tension. From playground Mafia to recent crazes like Among Us, ...
- 'There is no bomb': what I learned taking a polygraph teston March 5, 2021 at 5:34 am
“Did you plant the bomb?” It’s not a question I’ve been asked before but I’m comfortable enough denying it. Truth is – I didn’t plant a bomb. I planted a pretend bomb – a shoebox filled with webcams ...
- Seton Hall's Bryce Aiken boasts he 'ain't never missing' a free throw, promptly misses twoon March 4, 2021 at 9:05 am
Politicians lie. Statistics can lie. But ball? Ball don't lie. Seton Hall's Bryce Aiken was perfect on free throws this season entering Wednesday night's matchup vs. UConn, so, of course, he'd be ...
- IndyBar: Body Language Expert and Celebrity Lie Detector to Open Bench Bar 2021on March 2, 2021 at 11:01 pm
What if you could get exactly what you want in life by reading and understanding the body language of murderers?” asks Janine Driver, New York Times best-selling author and award-winning keynote ...
- Pentagon Report Assessed Lasers and Radar to Detect 'Deception'on March 2, 2021 at 11:08 am
It’s almost impossible to tell when humans are lying and the technology we use to do so is based on pseudoscience and bad research.
- Dr Christian: ‘Detection dogs could be vital in our fight against Covid’on March 1, 2021 at 9:18 am
Dr Christian Jessen with founder of Medical Detection Dogs Dr Claire Guest (Picture: Supplied) As an ambassador for Medical Detection Dogs – and one of the celebrities joining our Metro.co.uk Lifeline ...
- My husband is convinced I cheated despite paying £600 for a lie-detector teston February 28, 2021 at 11:42 am
I PAID £600 for a lie-detector test, have been to couples counselling and pleaded my innocence yet my husband is still adamant that I cheated. I am at my wits’ end. This awful episode ...
- Time's up for Cuomo: #MeToo demands an investigation into sex abuse allegations, GOP Rep. says NY governor should take a lie detector test and Meghan McCain calls him a ...on February 25, 2021 at 9:54 pm
Both Meghan McCain and Re. Nicole Malliotakis had harsh words fro Gov. Andrew Cuomo, but they were joined by MeToo CEO Tina Tchen in calls for an investigation into his sexual assault allegations.
- Cuomo dodges questions on whether or not he will take lie detector test he demanded of Kavanaughon February 25, 2021 at 11:07 am
New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who was recently accused of sexual harassment, is facing questions about calling for Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh to take a lie detector test after allegations of ...
via Bing News