In July, videos of the fatal police shootings of Alton Sterling—a black man in Louisiana—and Philando Castile—a black man in Minnesota—went viral on social media. The immediate aftermath of the Castile shooting was first shared via Facebook Live, which is a type of mobile streaming video technology (MSVT) that allows users to stream live video to followers, similar to Periscope and Meerkat.
The real-time video of Castile’s death reached over 5 million people within a week of its posting.
In a new study, Up, Periscope: Mobile Streaming Video Technologies, Privacy in Public, and the Right to Record, Jeremy Littau, assistant professor of journalism at Lehigh University, and Daxton Stewart, associate dean and associate professor in the Bob Schieffer College of Communication at Texas Christian University, examine the legal rights of people to record and live-stream and any potential right to be free from being recorded and streamed in public places.
The authors find that current laws protecting individual rights are insufficient to protect privacy when it comes to these technologies and that the First Amendment likely protects livestreaming activities of users.
“The Castile shooting is important not only for its content, but also because a Facebook user showed the public a new tool that it might not otherwise have known about or thought to use in a situation like this,” Littau says.
“What happened in Minnesota is one of those incidents that serve as a harbinger for what is to come.”
Because of the ease with which users are able to share live video streams, MSVTs have great potential to catalyze new privacy laws and policies, as legislatures, courts, citizens, and tech companies consider the balance between peoples individual’s right to privacy and the public’s right to free expression.
Littau says that mobile streaming technologies will soon completely change how the public views privacy. He predicts some entities will seek to carve out special exemptions for themselves.
“Our work already mentions situations where municipalities have tried to pass laws stopping citizens from recording police activities in public. It’s completely unconstitutional, but that won’t stop people from trying,” he explains. “Exempting public officials and government workers from the laws that apply to everyone is not a new idea in the U.S. At some point a locality is going to try and make it a crime to live stream police actions on the street.”
Services like Facebook Live break down the previous lag between information collection and information distribution, making potential privacy violations instantaneous and unavoidable, according to the research, which was published in print in Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly in June.
The researchers advocate that privacy challenges be addressed directly between by mobile streaming companies and their users via contracts. Attempts to strengthen privacy laws will likely be thwarted by First Amendment protections.
“Ultimately consumers of tools like Periscope and Facebook Live will shape the way they are used,” Dr. Stewart says.
“If the developers do not place restraints on use, and do not provide tools for the community of users to monitor content, then it’s likely we will continue to see them put to troubling uses such the teenager who live-streamed her suicide in France, or the young woman who live-streamed a friend being sexually assaulted earlier this year.”
Stewart says the biggest challenge that the courts will face when these cases arise will be trying to fit old ways of thinking about privacy and public spaces into new tools that weren’t even foreseeable when those approaches to privacy were developed. “In this study, we advocate for less legal restraint of recording and live-streaming public matters or government officials in public places, which clearly deserve First Amendment protection,” he says. “But we also call for wisdom by users and tech companies in controlling the spread of materials that may be more harmful to private individuals.”
The Latest on: Privacy law
[google_news title=”” keyword=”Privacy law” num_posts=”10″ blurb_length=”0″ show_thumb=”left”]
via Google News
The Latest on: Privacy law
- Police departments say iPhone's"NameDrop" feature could threaten privacyon November 27, 2023 at 5:57 am
The NameDrop feature, part of the latest iOS 17.1 update, could allow bad actors to grab your contact information just by bringing their phones close to yours. Law enforcement agencies have issued ...
- Law Enforcement Issues iOS 17 Security Warning Over NameDrop Featureon November 27, 2023 at 1:55 am
Is this iOS 17 feature really as dangerous as law enforcement might have have you think? The truth about NameDrop security.
- Could your student’s school devices be violating privacy, used against them?on November 24, 2023 at 6:00 am
Could your student's school devices be violating their privacy, in ways it could be used against them? A new report said the student surveillance company called Go Guardian and others like it have ...
- Chanel Korea Penalized for Violating Privacy Laws in Customer Data Collectionon November 24, 2023 at 2:08 am
Following the investigation, authorities have fined Chanel Korea for their breach of privacy laws, according to the Korea Joongang Daily. The amount of the fine has not been disclosed to the ...
- UK privacy watchdog warms local websites to adhere to privacy laws or face prosecutionon November 23, 2023 at 4:01 pm
UK’s privacy watchdog is once again warning British websites to comply with data protection laws or risk monetary penalties and prosecutions In this latest warning, the Information Commissioner’s ...
- Privacy watchdog investigating hack linked to military, RCMP moveson November 23, 2023 at 2:33 pm
Canada's privacy commissioner is investigating a cyberattack targeting a system used to relocate members of the military and foreign service.
- Ottawa and provinces should harmonize privacy laws, says think tankon November 21, 2023 at 4:00 pm
Ottawa should consider squeezing the provinces to enact similar federal, provincial and territorial privacy laws across Canada, says a new paper from the C.D. Howe Institute, which argues ...
- The university’s online privacy hub reflects changes to Quebec lawson November 19, 2023 at 4:00 pm
reflecting recent changes to Quebec’s privacy laws. With the adoption of Quebec’s Act to modernize legislative provisions as regards the protection of personal information (Law 25), changes will roll ...
- Privacy Act concernson November 16, 2023 at 5:11 am
How can law enforcement (officers) shoot and kill someone and then bury the identities of those involved for years? I believe it's all about how Canada's new privacy laws are interpreted.
- A new era of privacy laws takes shape in the United Stateson November 15, 2023 at 11:05 am
Fredric D. Bellamy and Ashley N. Fernandez, formerly and currently with Dickinson Wright PLLC, respectively, discuss the rights, scope and enforcement of state data privacy laws that have taken effect ...
via Bing News