Image via Wikipedia
The EPA must act swiftly to evaluate the possible health risks of nanotechnology
A decade ago the great worry about nanotechnology was that it could quite literally destroy the planet. As Sun Microsystems co-founder Bill Joy warned in his essay “Why the Future Doesn’t Need Us,” self-assembling nanobots could potentially spread out of our control (Mis-)programmed to replicate ad infinitum, these subsentient bots would spread across the landscape as a gray goo of devastation, consuming the earth and every unlucky creature who called it home.
Nowadays we can only wish that our planet-dooming scenarios were so far-fetched. Our existential worries revolve around the all too immediate problems of global warming and disease, and nanotechnology—incorporated into improved solar panels, wind turbines or drug delivery mechanisms—could, if anything, emerge as an important tool to fight these threats.
Yet like any new technology, nanomaterials carry with them potential both for good and for harm. The most salient worries concern not a gray goo apocalypse but rather the more prosaic and likely possibility that some of these novel materials may turn out to be hazardous to our health or the environment. Because ordinary materials display unique properties at the nanoscale, the nanometer-size bits of a seemingly benign material might turn out to be noxious. As John D. Young and Jan Martel report in “The Rise and Fall of Nanobacteria,” even naturally occurring nanoparticulates can have an deleterious effect on the human body. If natural nanoparticulates can harm us, we would be wise to carefully consider the possible actions of engineered nanomaterials. The size of nanoparticles also means that they can more readily escape into the environment and infiltrate deep into internal organs such as the lungs and liver. Adding to the concern, each nanomaterial is unique. Although researchers have conducted a number of studies on the health risks of individual materials, this scattershot approach cannot provide a comprehensive picture of the hazards—quantitative data on what materials, in what concentrations, affect the body over what timescales.
In response to this uncertainty, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency recently announced a grand research strategy to study the health and environmental effects of nanomaterials, a welcome step that many have been advocating for years. We hope that the program will help build a robust database that will give policy makers and the public the facts needed to understand the possible health risks that specific nanomaterials might create. And although it would be unwise to rush careful research efforts, speed is paramount. According to the Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies, more than 1,000 consumer products containing nanomaterials are available in the U.S., a number that is quickly growing.
First published on Dec 28, 2009
The Latest on: Possible health risks of nanotechnology
via Google News
The Latest on: Possible health risks of nanotechnology
- Johnson & Johnson COVID vaccine rekindles religious dilemma over morality of using fetal tissueon March 3, 2021 at 12:43 pm
Roman Catholic leaders in St. Louis and New Orleans are advising Catholics that the COVID-19 vaccine from Johnson & Johnson, newly approved for use in the U.S., is "morally compromised" because it is ...
- Learning about health from trusted sources may help teens battle depressionon March 3, 2021 at 12:41 pm
Depression can be a common problem for teens and adolescents, and while many treatments exist, they don't always work for everyone. A new study found that feeling more informed about their health may ...
- Nebraska to vaccinate people ages 50-64 and younger folks with high-risk conditionson March 3, 2021 at 12:17 pm
Nebraska will put 90% of COVID-19 vaccines into the arms of people ages 50-64 and give up to 10% to people with high-risk medical conditions.
- Study shows high risk of anxiety, burnout in emergency department health care workers from COVID-19on March 3, 2021 at 11:47 am
The COVID-19 pandemic has taken a toll on the mental health of emergency department staff, both clinical and non-clinical. The COVID-19 pandemic has taken a toll on the mental health of emergency ...
- MUSC Children's health experts warn of increased suicide rates among youthon March 3, 2021 at 10:18 am
As cases continue to surge amidst the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, health experts at the Medical University of South Carolina warn of massive increases in youth suicides occurring both on a national and ...
- Health Insurance Providers Commit to Help Millions of Seniors in Underserved Communities Receive COVID Vaccineson March 3, 2021 at 8:33 am
Health insurance providers launch Vaccine Community Connectors pilot initiative to reach seniors in underserved communities ...
- Phunware Selected by Dignity Health Yavapai Regional Medical Center for Location Based Services Softwareon March 3, 2021 at 5:30 am
Phunware, Inc., a fully-integrated enterprise cloud platform for mobile that provides products, solutions, data and services for brands worldwide, announced today that it has closed a five-year ...
- What You Need For Mitigating Risk Of Natural Disasterson March 2, 2021 at 12:20 pm
To gain deeper insights into employing AI for Natural Disaster Management, I did a non-profit IEEE chat with the new focus group chair, Dr. Monique Kuglitsch.
- Minnesota health systems to identify at-risk patients for next round of COVID-19 shotson March 1, 2021 at 5:54 pm
People with health conditions that make them susceptible to COVID-19 complications most likely will be contacted by their health care provider when it's their turn to get the shot. "We'll use our ...
- CDC director warns U.S. is at risk of losing 'hard-earned ground' gained in the pandemicon March 1, 2021 at 11:10 am
The director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is warning states against rolling back COVID-19 restrictions as she expresses concern about a possible fourth surge of cases. CDC ...
via Bing News
