Curbs on free speech are growing tighter. It is time to speak out
IN A sense, this is a golden age for free speech. Your smartphone can call up newspapers from the other side of world in seconds. More than a billion tweets, Facebook posts and blog updates are published every single day. Anyone with access to the internet can be a publisher, and anyone who can reach Wikipedia enters a digital haven where America’s First Amendment reigns
However, watchdogs report that speaking out is becoming more dangerous—and they are right. As our report shows, curbs on free speech have grown tighter. Without the contest of ideas, the world is timid and ignorant.
Free speech is under attack in three ways. First, repression by governments has increased. Several countries have reimposed cold-war controls or introduced new ones. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, Russia enjoyed a free-for-all of vigorous debate. Under Vladimir Putin, the muzzle has tightened again. All the main television-news outlets are now controlled by the state or by Mr Putin’s cronies. Journalists who ask awkward questions are no longer likely to be sent to labour camps, but several have been murdered.
China’s leader, Xi Jinping, ordered a crackdown after he took over in 2012, toughening up censorship of social media, arresting hundreds of dissidents and replacing liberal debate in universities with extra Marxism. In the Middle East the overthrow of despots during the Arab spring let people speak freely for the first time in generations. This has lasted in Tunisia, but Syria and Libya are more dangerous for journalists than they were before the uprisings; and Egypt is ruled by a man who says, with a straight face: “Don’t listen to anyone but me.”
Words, sticks and stones
Second, a worrying number of non-state actors are enforcing censorship by assassination. Reporters in Mexico who investigate crime or corruption are often murdered, and sometimes tortured first. Jihadists slaughter those they think have insulted their faith. When authors and artists say anything that might be deemed disrespectful of Islam, they take risks. Secular bloggers in Bangladesh are hacked to death in the street (see article); French cartoonists are gunned down in their offices. The jihadists hurt Muslims more than any others, not least by making it harder for them to have an honest discussion about how to organise their societies.
Third, the idea has spread that people and groups have a right not to be offended. This may sound innocuous. Politeness is a virtue, after all. But if I have a right not to be offended, that means someone must police what you say about me, or about the things I hold dear, such as my ethnic group, religion, or even political beliefs. Since offence is subjective, the power to police it is both vast and arbitrary.
Learn more: Free speech Under attack
The Latest on: Free speech
via Google News
The Latest on: Free speech
- After settlement, freedom of speech, yellow sign and First Amendment 'stand tall in Brookfield'on March 6, 2021 at 9:22 pm
U.S. District Court Judge Timothy S. Hillman announced that the civil action involving John D. Holdcraft, plaintiff, and his 8-foot-by-4-foot “Freedom of Speech” sign on 6 South Maple St., and the ...
- During trial, free speech, public safety will both be protectedon March 6, 2021 at 3:00 pm
We will preserve the First Amendment rights of those who protest, but those who hurt people or harm property will be arrested.
- Ignore this manufactured crisis: free speech is alive and well in our universitieson March 5, 2021 at 1:00 am
Higher education faces many challenges, but freedom of expression is well protected by the existing legal framework, say barrister John Bowers and former EHRC chair David Isaac ...
- Government, Not Big Tech, Is the Biggest Threat to Free Speechon March 4, 2021 at 2:45 am
Recent legislative efforts should serve as a reminder that the most dangerous threat to Americans' free speech isn't tech executives in California––it's the people we elect and send to Washington. The ...
- Norman Fischer: Free speech and the legacy of Norman Rockwell’s Four Freedomson March 4, 2021 at 12:05 am
This commentary is by Norman Arthur Fischer of Burlington, author of “Marxist Ethics Within Western Political Theory, a Dialogue with Republicanism, Communitarianism, and Liberalism,” and a retired ...
- Judge Andrew P. Napolitano: Silencing free speech -- when the First Amendment is not enforced, this can happenon March 3, 2021 at 9:18 pm
Why do people in power try to silence speech with which they disagree? Last week produced news about the suppression of speech on university campuses. There, the suppression usually occurs through the ...
- Parler Sues Amazon Again, Saying It Stifled Free Speechon March 3, 2021 at 1:03 pm
Parler LLC, the conservative social media platform, opened a new front in its legal battle with Amazon.com Inc., accusing the tech giant of bad faith after being banished from its servers in the ...
- Alex Jones argues 'blood on the streets' rant against attorney of Newtown families was protected free speechon March 3, 2021 at 10:17 am
Extremist Alex Jones has appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, arguing that his “blood on the streets” rant against an attorney representing families who lost loved ones in the Sandy Hook shooting was ...
- To protect free speech, protect the Digital Millennium Copyright Acton March 3, 2021 at 8:00 am
Allegations of online bias and political censorship simmered throughout the last presidential election, culminating with the de-platforming of a sitting president. While this has led to an animated ...
- With this Case, the Court Can Tell Campus Officials They Must Respect Free Speechon March 2, 2021 at 8:58 pm
The Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments in a case that’s hard to pronounce but extremely important for free speech on college campuses.
via Bing News