Old-fashioned ways of reporting new discoveries are holding back medical research. Some scientists are pushing for change
“NEVER tried sharing data like this before,” said the tweet. “Feels like walking into a country for the first time. Exciting, but don’t know what to expect.”
David O’Connor of the University of Wisconsin-Madison was announcing his decision on February 14th to post online data from his laboratory’s latest experiment. He and his team had infected macaques with the Zika virus and were recording the concentrations of virus in the monkeys’ bodily fluids every day. Researchers know that Zika is transmitted principally by infected mosquitoes. But if the virus appears in saliva and urine then these might also be sources of infection.
Dr O’Connor and his colleagues published their results every day to a publicly accessible website. They hoped this would be useful to others working on the disease and, ultimately, to health authorities striving to contain it. They did not expect to garner much attention. But they did.
Within days, researchers from all over the world started contacting them, making suggestions and asking for samples to conduct work that Dr O’Connor’s lab was ill-equipped to carry out. He describes the experience of data-sharing as “universally positive”. But as his tweet suggests, such openness is far from routine.
Careers in medical research hang on publishing papers in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and Cell. Even in emergencies such as the recent Zika outbreak, or the earlier epidemic of Ebola fever in west Africa, biologists are reluctant to share data until their work is published.
Once a paper is submitted to a journal, though, its findings can languish unseen for months as it goes through a vetting process known as peer review. Reviewers can ask for substantial changes, further experiments and also suggest the journal reject the paper outright. If several journals turn down a paper before it is published, it may be years before the results become public.
Left in the dark in this way, other practitioners may waste time and money conducting unnecessary experiments. In cases where the unpublished work might warn of things like unsafe treatments, the cost of the delay could be measured in lives. Dr O’Connor’s response is part of a reaction against this delay.
He is not alone. On February 10th, prompted by concerns that vital data on the Zika epidemic could be held up by journal peer review, scientific academies, research funders and a number of academic publishers urged researchers “to make any information available that might have value in combating the crisis”. The publishers promised that posting a paper online as a so-called preprint would not disqualify it from publication in a journal later.
But not all publishers signed up to the agreement, and it raises many questions. As Stephen Curry of Imperial College London noted in a blog post for the Guardian, a British daily newspaper, if the approach is valid for Zika, then why not for other infectious diseases, including malaria or HIV/AIDS, which kill millions every year?
Learn more: Research publishing: Taking the online medicine
The Latest on: Open science
via Google News
The Latest on: Open science
- Golf That Matters: 3M Uses 3M Open To Give Back to the Communityon August 5, 2022 at 6:00 am
Minnesota’s one and only PGA TOUR event, that recently took place at TPC Twin Cities in Blaine, Minnesota – is about more than golf for 3M. It’s also a way for the ...
- Coronapod: the open-science plan to unseat big Pharma and tackle vaccine inequityon July 28, 2022 at 5:00 pm
Can a UN-led collaboration of 15 countries deliver vaccine independence to the global south against all the odds?
- Code Ocean Announces Open Science Library Allowing No-cost, Turn-key Replication of Computational Science Experimentson July 19, 2022 at 6:54 am
Unique Development and Library Platform Available Free to Researchers for Developing and Publishing Open Science Code That Is Ready to Run on AWS OSL: A free site for publishing/replicating ...
- Wolters Kluwer expands commitment to open scienceon July 19, 2022 at 6:32 am
To support the evolution of medical publishing toward higher velocity exchange of scientific findings, Wolters Kluwer, Health announced two key additions to the Lippincott® portfolio. The Lippincott ...
- Code Ocean Announces Open Science Library Allowing No-cost, Turn-key Replication of Computational Science Experimentson July 19, 2022 at 6:26 am
Unique Development and Library Platform Available Free to Researchers for Developing and Publishing Open Science Code That Is Ready to Run on AWS NEW YORK, July 19, 2022 /PRNewswire/ -- Code Ocean ...
- A Decade of Open Science (IMAGE)on July 12, 2022 at 7:30 pm
The journal GigaScience celebrates its 10th anniversary with a look at the milestones it has reached and the milestones to achieve in the arena of open science . Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert!
- A decade of open science: Milestones in achieving UNESCO’s open science recommendationson July 11, 2022 at 5:01 pm
GigaScience celebrates its first decade in publishing by looking to the UNESCO Open Science recommendations to assess the journal’s successes in this arena and to set its future goals The year ...
- Openness of Research Resultson October 28, 2021 at 6:50 am
Avoin tiede vahvistaa demokratiaa Openness has always been part of responsible science and research. Research must be reproducible so that the accuracy and quality of research can be ensured. The ...
- Open science and researchon October 11, 2020 at 11:45 pm
Openness is the starting point for and a fundamental value of science and research. At its best it promotes equality and generates educational and cultural capital. Knowledge and learning are for ...
- Starting to practice Open Scienceon June 9, 2020 at 9:35 am
Open access (free access without request) publications are an easy way to start practicing open science. There are two type of open access, green and gold. Both are open, and both work to give folks ...
via Bing News