Old-fashioned ways of reporting new discoveries are holding back medical research. Some scientists are pushing for change
“NEVER tried sharing data like this before,” said the tweet. “Feels like walking into a country for the first time. Exciting, but don’t know what to expect.”
David O’Connor of the University of Wisconsin-Madison was announcing his decision on February 14th to post online data from his laboratory’s latest experiment. He and his team had infected macaques with the Zika virus and were recording the concentrations of virus in the monkeys’ bodily fluids every day. Researchers know that Zika is transmitted principally by infected mosquitoes. But if the virus appears in saliva and urine then these might also be sources of infection.
Dr O’Connor and his colleagues published their results every day to a publicly accessible website. They hoped this would be useful to others working on the disease and, ultimately, to health authorities striving to contain it. They did not expect to garner much attention. But they did.
Within days, researchers from all over the world started contacting them, making suggestions and asking for samples to conduct work that Dr O’Connor’s lab was ill-equipped to carry out. He describes the experience of data-sharing as “universally positive”. But as his tweet suggests, such openness is far from routine.
Careers in medical research hang on publishing papers in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and Cell. Even in emergencies such as the recent Zika outbreak, or the earlier epidemic of Ebola fever in west Africa, biologists are reluctant to share data until their work is published.
Once a paper is submitted to a journal, though, its findings can languish unseen for months as it goes through a vetting process known as peer review. Reviewers can ask for substantial changes, further experiments and also suggest the journal reject the paper outright. If several journals turn down a paper before it is published, it may be years before the results become public.
Left in the dark in this way, other practitioners may waste time and money conducting unnecessary experiments. In cases where the unpublished work might warn of things like unsafe treatments, the cost of the delay could be measured in lives. Dr O’Connor’s response is part of a reaction against this delay.
He is not alone. On February 10th, prompted by concerns that vital data on the Zika epidemic could be held up by journal peer review, scientific academies, research funders and a number of academic publishers urged researchers “to make any information available that might have value in combating the crisis”. The publishers promised that posting a paper online as a so-called preprint would not disqualify it from publication in a journal later.
But not all publishers signed up to the agreement, and it raises many questions. As Stephen Curry of Imperial College London noted in a blog post for the Guardian, a British daily newspaper, if the approach is valid for Zika, then why not for other infectious diseases, including malaria or HIV/AIDS, which kill millions every year?
Learn more: Research publishing: Taking the online medicine
The Latest on: Open science
via Google News
The Latest on: Open science
- Consultation with Indigenous Peoples on the UNESCO Recommendation on Open Scienceon April 17, 2021 at 3:59 pm
As a part of a series of thematic consultations for building a global consensus on Open Science, UNESCO organized an online meeting on January 15 to take stock of Indigenous peoples‘ perspective on ...
- A guide to Plan S: the open-access initiative shaking up science publishingon April 8, 2021 at 10:19 am
As the first papers under these mandates are published, Plan S supporters say it’s the start of a journey towards open science. But most research funders haven’t signed up yet, and negotiations over ...
- Royal Society Open Scienceon March 30, 2021 at 5:00 pm
Royal Society Open Science is a new open journal publishing high-quality original research across the entire range of science on the basis of objective peer-review. The journal covers the entire ...
- Systematization of clinical knowledge for developmental disability support based on open science type researchon March 28, 2021 at 9:41 am
(1) The development of the evidence construction platform based on the open science type research method led by citizens is completed, and it will be used in various regions and areas.(2) Summarize ...
- Leveraging Open Science to Accelerate Researchon March 25, 2021 at 3:24 am
We believe that policymakers should incorporate open-science principles into research policies and programs to optimize the return on federal investment in clinical research, which could have ...
- Openscapes: Using "The Force" of Open Science in the Cloudon March 24, 2021 at 8:31 am
This NASA-funded project supports researchers migrating workflows to the cloud using open, collaborative workflows. In The Empire Strikes Back, when Luke Skywalker crashed his X-wing fighter in a ...
- 3 Ways the Pandemic Has Made the World Betteron March 20, 2021 at 9:07 pm
We should embrace the extraordinary and robust process of open science and more peer review, as well as its dynamism, even as we establish new guardrails to contain its energy. The pandemic ...
- Psychology Todayon March 15, 2021 at 8:12 am
I asked, a little timidly. “Very well,” the adventurer pointed at a bottle of potion labelled “Open Science Me” on a glass table behind me. I examined the bottle and sipped it carefully ...
- Roundtable on Aligning Incentives for Open Scienceon August 2, 2020 at 3:42 pm
The actual and potential benefits of open science include strengthened rigor and reliability, the ability to address new questions,faster and more inclusive dissemination of knowledge, broader ...
- About ESA Open Scienceon April 23, 2020 at 1:09 am
Open science is the idea that the products and the process of science should be freely accessible (i.e. open) to everyone. This includes things like open educational materials, open access ...
via Bing News