Half of mouse studies fail to report the sex and age of the models involved
A project at The University of Manchester to analyse 15,000 mouse studies – the largest of its kind ever undertaken – has revealed that about half of these studies failed to report the sex and age of the mice involved, despite these being recognised as key variables that can affect the outcome of scientific studies.
The project utilised text mining software developed at the University, which can analyse large collections of documents to unearth information which would otherwise have been virtually impossible to discover. The software relies on a number of rules, which automatically scan the method section of papers to identify mentions of gender and age.
The results of the project, published this week in eLife, highlight the issue of reproducibility of scientific research – around £20 billion is spent every year on research which is not reproducible, and over 80% of potential therapeutics fail in humans after being tested in mice.
Previously published studies have suggested that research done on female animals may not be applicable for men, and in many of the studies analysed in this project, the animals used were overwhelmingly female. This may be due to female mice being less aggressive, which makes them easier to use in the studies. This is important, because the sexes can have markedly different responses to the same investigations – for example, in infection research.
This may significantly reduce the reliability of studies, and lead to drugs that won’t work for half of the population.
The reproducibility of studies often focuses on the interpretation of statistics, but this project has highlighted that the methods used may not be reported rigorously enough to assess whether they were done correctly. By looking at the methods used, it is possible to infer whether or not the statistics produced are sound, and reproducible in the future. Without knowing these methods, this cannot be inferred at all, which hampers cross-disciplinary research and longevity of data.
The project has produced a vital tool to measure the reproducibility of scientific studies, but there is a long way to go – failure to consider gender in research is still very much the norm, and according to one analysis of scientific studies published in 2009, only 45% of animal studies involving depression or anxiety and only 38 percent involving strokes used females, even though these conditions are more common in women.
“The opportunity to use text mining to cover such a broad portfolio of research was brilliant, and vital to see the bigger picture,” said Sheena Cruickshank, Senior Lecturer in Immunology at The University of Manchester. “We are an interdisciplinary team, and it was this which enabled us to spot this issue and then explore it. The paper builds on several pieces of work we have done together, and highlights the importance of the scientific community to come together and define what is important in the current reproducibility crisis.”
“This study has demonstrated how state-of-the-art computer science technology is instrumental for a large-scale and systematic analysis of literature,” said Dr Goran Nenadic from The University of Manchester’s School of Computer Science. “It avoids small sample bias, and allows us to explore the research landscape on a large scale to identify key issues in reporting details of scientific methodologies, which are necessary for reproducibility, transparency and fidelity of research.”
The Latest on: Reproducibility of scientific research
via Google News
The Latest on: Reproducibility of scientific research
- Simulations Plus Awards Infrastructure Improvement Grant to Makerere University Department of Pharmacology and Therapeuticson January 14, 2021 at 5:30 am
Simulations Plus, Inc., a leading provider of population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling and simulation services, today announced that its Cognigen division has awarded a grant to the ...
- L7 Informatics deploys ESP Software Platform for COVID-19 Workflow at University of Oregonon January 5, 2021 at 12:55 am
L7 Informatics announced that it has deployed L7|ESP to automate all lab operations starting with implementing a COVID-19 workflow at the University of Oregon (UO). The university offers free COVID-19 ...
- Scientific Reproducibility: Raising the Standards for Biomedicineon January 2, 2021 at 4:00 pm
The vast majority of findings published in high-profile biomedical research publications ... At one level, a system for checking on scientific reproducibility could demand that each component ...
- Review Explores Reproducibility and Replicability in Scienceon December 18, 2020 at 8:37 am
CAMBRIDGE, MA — December 16, 2020 — In 2019, the National Academies of Science, Engineering ... "The overall aim of reproducibility and replicability is to ensure that our research findings are ...
- Reproducible Research Support Service (R2S2)on November 13, 2020 at 12:27 am
much easier if you consider reproducibility from the start of a research project. If there are no experts on computational reproducibility or open science at your lab/institute/working group, we are ...
- Scientific Integrity and Research Misconducton August 21, 2020 at 12:13 pm
Scientific integrity is the condition resulting from adherence to professional values and practices when conducting, reporting, and applying the results of scientific activities that ensures ...
- Rigor and Reproducibilityon August 19, 2020 at 12:09 am
to ensure that such studies can be reproduced. This webpage provides information about the efforts underway by NIH to enhance rigor and reproducibility in scientific research.
- Enhancing Reproducibility in Biomedical Research through Harmonization of Guidelines for Transparent Reporting: A Workshopon August 3, 2020 at 8:39 am
The public workshop will feature invited presentations and discussions to: Discuss the impact of transparent reporting of biomedical research on scientific reproducibility Examine principles and ...
- Enhancing Scientific Reproducibility through Transparent Reporting – A Workshopon August 2, 2020 at 10:52 am
Read Our Expert Reports and Published Proceedings Explore PNAS, the Official Scientific Journal of NAS Access Transportation Research Board Publications Our peer-reviewed reports present the ...
- Integration of National Soil and Wetland Datasets: A Toolkit for Reproducible Calculation and Quality Assessment of Imputed Wetland Soil Propertieson December 21, 2018 at 6:39 am
The project methods build on the project team’s current research and development of best practices for analysis and application of soil and wetland data. Documentation of the process is meant to ...
via Bing News