From Apple’s Siri to Honda’s robot Asimo, machines seem to be getting better and better at communicating with humans.
But some neuroscientists caution that today’s computers will never truly understand what we’re saying because they do not take into account the context of a conversation the way people do.
Specifically, say University of California, Berkeley, postdoctoral fellow Arjen Stolk and his Dutch colleagues, machines don’t develop a shared understanding of the people, place and situation – often including a long social history – that is key to human communication. Without such common ground, a computer cannot help but be confused.
“People tend to think of communication as an exchange of linguistic signs or gestures, forgetting that much of communication is about the social context, about who you are communicating with,” Stolk said.
The word “bank,” for example, would be interpreted one way if you’re holding a credit card but a different way if you’re holding a fishing pole. Without context, making a “V” with two fingers could mean victory, the number two, or “these are the two fingers I broke.”
“All these subtleties are quite crucial to understanding one another,” Stolk said, perhaps more so than the words and signals that computers and many neuroscientists focus on as the key to communication. “In fact, we can understand one another without language, without words and signs that already have a shared meaning.”
Babies and parents, not to mention strangers lacking a common language, communicate effectively all the time, based solely on gestures and a shared context they build up over even a short time.
Stolk argues that scientists and engineers should focus more on the contextual aspects of mutual understanding, basing his argument on experimental evidence from brain scans that humans achieve nonverbal mutual understanding using unique computational and neural mechanisms. Some of the studies Stolk has conducted suggest that a breakdown in mutual understanding is behind social disorders such as autism.
“This shift in understanding how people communicate without any need for language provides a new theoretical and empirical foundation for understanding normal social communication, and provides a new window into understanding and treating disorders of social communication in neurological and neurodevelopmental disorders,” said Dr. Robert Knight, a UC Berkeley professor of psychology in the campus’s Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute and a professor of neurology and neurosurgery at UCSF.
Stolk and his colleagues discuss the importance of conceptual alignment for mutual understanding in an opinion piece appearing Jan. 11 in the journal Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
Brain scans pinpoint site for ‘meeting of minds’
To explore how brains achieve mutual understanding, Stolk created a game that requires two players to communicate the rules to each other solely by game movements, without talking or even seeing one another, eliminating the influence of language or gesture. He then placed both players in an fMRI (functional magnetic resonance imager) and scanned their brains as they nonverbally communicated with one another via computer.
He found that the same regions of the brain – located in the poorly understood right temporal lobe, just above the ear – became active in both players during attempts to communicate the rules of the game. Critically, the superior temporal gyrus of the right temporal lobe maintained a steady, baseline activity throughout the game but became more active when one player suddenly understood what the other player was trying to communicate. The brain’s right hemisphere is more involved in abstract thought and social interactions than the left hemisphere.
“These regions in the right temporal lobe increase in activity the moment you establish a shared meaning for something, but not when you communicate a signal,” Stolk said. “The better the players got at understanding each other, the more active this region became.”
This means that both players are building a similar conceptual framework in the same area of the brain, constantly testing one another to make sure their concepts align, and updating only when new information changes that mutual understanding. The results were reported in 2014 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
“It is surprising,” said Stolk, “that for both the communicator, who has static input while she is planning her move, and the addressee, who is observing dynamic visual input during the game, the same region of the brain becomes more active over the course of the experiment as they improve their mutual understanding.”
Robots’ statistical reasoning
Robots and computers, on the other hand, converse based on a statistical analysis of a word’s meaning, Stolk said. If you usually use the word “bank” to mean a place to cash a check, then that will be the assumed meaning in a conversation, even when the conversation is about fishing.
The Latest on: Human computer understanding
[google_news title=”” keyword=”human computer understanding” num_posts=”10″ blurb_length=”0″ show_thumb=”left”]
via Google News
The Latest on: Human computer understanding
- Are Large Multimodal Models the Key to Human-like Machine Understanding?on February 29, 2024 at 8:51 pm
In the realm of artificial intelligence (AI), a significant breakthrough is underway with the emergence of Large Multimodal Models (LMMs), marking a shift from unimodal to multimodal learning. This ...
- Why large language models aren’t headed toward humanlike understandingon February 27, 2024 at 4:00 pm
Suddenly computers approached human ability at identifying images ... really understand the world (at least not in any sort of sense that corresponds to human understanding). “What’s really remarkable ...
- Affective computing: Connecting computing with human emotions for empathetic AIon February 26, 2024 at 1:58 pm
Imagine a world where your smartphone can detect your mood just by the way you type a message or the tone of your voice. Picture a car that adjusts its music playlist based on your stress levels ...
- How Three New Museums Are Teaching the World About a Paradigm Shift in Our Understanding of Human Originson February 15, 2024 at 4:00 pm
By understanding human origins, people will see that we are all more united than divided in so many ways.” Race and racism are discussed strongly in the exhibit. Black says this is because ...
- What Is Phishing? Understanding Cyber Attackson February 13, 2024 at 11:49 am
Falling victim to phishing scams can leave you vulnerable. Learn more about the types of phishing attacks, how to spot them, and cybersecurity best practices.
- Recent advances in the understanding of human socialityon February 1, 2024 at 10:30 am
He will attempt to show how these advances move us closer to having a unified scientific understanding of human sociality. Joseph Heath is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Toronto. A ...
- The Human “Contaminome” and Understanding Infectious Diseaseon January 24, 2024 at 4:00 pm
When the samples under intentional investigation are human, microbial contaminants might ... the Department of Computer Science and Center for Computational Biology, Whiting School of Engineering ...
- Understanding Human Evolutionon April 8, 2023 at 9:47 pm
Elegantly illustrated, Understanding Human Evolution is for anyone interested in the complex and tangled story of how we came to be. 'For years, Ian Tattersall has been the go-to source for the latest ...
- Understanding People: Extensions of Human Computer Interactionon February 22, 2023 at 8:12 am
Nonetheless, we need to start understanding what it is about the design of these ... to plan and design environments that appropriately affect, and are affected by, human behaviour (i.e., fair, ...
- Human Factorson August 4, 2022 at 1:47 pm
In one of the first undergraduate programs of its kind in the nation, you'll take courses in psychology, systems engineering, human-computer interaction ... "My work with Rocket Mortgage focuses on ...
via Bing News