From Apple’s Siri to Honda’s robot Asimo, machines seem to be getting better and better at communicating with humans.
But some neuroscientists caution that today’s computers will never truly understand what we’re saying because they do not take into account the context of a conversation the way people do.
Specifically, say University of California, Berkeley, postdoctoral fellow Arjen Stolk and his Dutch colleagues, machines don’t develop a shared understanding of the people, place and situation – often including a long social history – that is key to human communication. Without such common ground, a computer cannot help but be confused.
“People tend to think of communication as an exchange of linguistic signs or gestures, forgetting that much of communication is about the social context, about who you are communicating with,” Stolk said.
The word “bank,” for example, would be interpreted one way if you’re holding a credit card but a different way if you’re holding a fishing pole. Without context, making a “V” with two fingers could mean victory, the number two, or “these are the two fingers I broke.”
“All these subtleties are quite crucial to understanding one another,” Stolk said, perhaps more so than the words and signals that computers and many neuroscientists focus on as the key to communication. “In fact, we can understand one another without language, without words and signs that already have a shared meaning.”
Babies and parents, not to mention strangers lacking a common language, communicate effectively all the time, based solely on gestures and a shared context they build up over even a short time.
Stolk argues that scientists and engineers should focus more on the contextual aspects of mutual understanding, basing his argument on experimental evidence from brain scans that humans achieve nonverbal mutual understanding using unique computational and neural mechanisms. Some of the studies Stolk has conducted suggest that a breakdown in mutual understanding is behind social disorders such as autism.
“This shift in understanding how people communicate without any need for language provides a new theoretical and empirical foundation for understanding normal social communication, and provides a new window into understanding and treating disorders of social communication in neurological and neurodevelopmental disorders,” said Dr. Robert Knight, a UC Berkeley professor of psychology in the campus’s Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute and a professor of neurology and neurosurgery at UCSF.
Stolk and his colleagues discuss the importance of conceptual alignment for mutual understanding in an opinion piece appearing Jan. 11 in the journal Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
Brain scans pinpoint site for ‘meeting of minds’
To explore how brains achieve mutual understanding, Stolk created a game that requires two players to communicate the rules to each other solely by game movements, without talking or even seeing one another, eliminating the influence of language or gesture. He then placed both players in an fMRI (functional magnetic resonance imager) and scanned their brains as they nonverbally communicated with one another via computer.
He found that the same regions of the brain – located in the poorly understood right temporal lobe, just above the ear – became active in both players during attempts to communicate the rules of the game. Critically, the superior temporal gyrus of the right temporal lobe maintained a steady, baseline activity throughout the game but became more active when one player suddenly understood what the other player was trying to communicate. The brain’s right hemisphere is more involved in abstract thought and social interactions than the left hemisphere.
“These regions in the right temporal lobe increase in activity the moment you establish a shared meaning for something, but not when you communicate a signal,” Stolk said. “The better the players got at understanding each other, the more active this region became.”
This means that both players are building a similar conceptual framework in the same area of the brain, constantly testing one another to make sure their concepts align, and updating only when new information changes that mutual understanding. The results were reported in 2014 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
“It is surprising,” said Stolk, “that for both the communicator, who has static input while she is planning her move, and the addressee, who is observing dynamic visual input during the game, the same region of the brain becomes more active over the course of the experiment as they improve their mutual understanding.”
Robots’ statistical reasoning
Robots and computers, on the other hand, converse based on a statistical analysis of a word’s meaning, Stolk said. If you usually use the word “bank” to mean a place to cash a check, then that will be the assumed meaning in a conversation, even when the conversation is about fishing.
The Latest on: Human computer understanding
via Google News
The Latest on: Human computer understanding
- Grasping for understanding as technology glitches upend lifeon August 6, 2022 at 2:45 pm
One of the seven Gifts of the Holy Spirit is Understanding. For me as a counselor, behaviorist, human being … understanding encompasses everything in my professional and secular life – discerning the ...
- Shrunken Head Held at Museum Was Made From Boiled Human Skinon August 4, 2022 at 3:47 am
The ceremonial heads were used by indigenous South American peoples, and a modern scan technique can be used to tell which ones are authentic.
- Craters, caves on moon could shelter human habitationon August 2, 2022 at 5:20 pm
With the help of the lunar orbiter, scientists discovered pits on the moon in 2009, a finding that prompted scientists to wonder if there were connecting caves that could be explored or even used ...
- Understanding the evolution of the metaverse for businesson July 31, 2022 at 5:10 pm
Organizations may use the metaverse to optimize business operations and enrich employee collaboration and training experiences.
- Human-like features in robot behavior: Response time variability can be perceived as human-likeon July 27, 2022 at 11:00 am
Humans behave and act in a way that other humans can recognize as human-like. If humanness has specific features, is it possible to replicate these features on a machine like a robot? Researchers at ...
- Cross-pollination among neuroscience, psychology and AI research yields a foundational understanding of thinkingon July 25, 2022 at 6:07 am
Progress in artificial intelligence has enabled the creation of AIs that perform tasks previously thought only possible for humans, such as translating languages, driving cars, playing board games at ...
- Why woodpeckers actually don’t need shock-absorbing skulls to headbangon July 16, 2022 at 7:20 am
Using computer simulations of a water-filled cavity to represent avian and human brains, they found that woodpeckers aren’t subjected to as much damaging pressure as a bulkier human brain would ...
- Meta's 'Make-A-Scene' AI blends human and computer imagination into algorithmic arton July 14, 2022 at 4:51 am
and Google’s Imagen AIs unleashing tidal waves of wonderfully weird procedurally generated art synthesized from human and computer imaginations. On Tuesday, Meta revealed that it too has ...
- Understanding the current social engineering threat landscapeon July 13, 2022 at 6:07 am
Were you unable to attend Transform 2022? Check out all of the summit sessions in our on-demand library now! Watch here. The weakest link in the security chain is not our processes or our ...
- Meet Plato, an AI That Gains Intuition Like a Human Babyon July 12, 2022 at 10:52 am
commonsense understanding of how our universe's mechanics work, just like a human baby. It's named Physics Learning Through Auto-encoding and Tracking Objects, or PLATO -- undoubtedly a nod to the ...
via Bing News