Should everyone get a minimum inheritance at birth? How about a government-guaranteed income or job? In the face of a growing income gap, we may need to get revolutionary.
If you’re going to talk about solutions to inequality in America and globally and don’t want to piss anyone off, one of the best things to talk about is skills and education. Workforce training and college affordability are popular topics partly because they work (sometimes) and partly because they go nowhere near the red/blue sore-points of the body politic. No wonder getting more skills and education to people—opening up opportunity—is the preferred thing for polite politicians, policy wonks, business people, and the great bipartisan middle of America to discuss.
But it’s arguable if “skills and education” is really a sufficient response to the inequality problem, which has been growing. We’ve seen spiraling incomes at the top-end (the 1%) and, more importantly, long-term stagnation in many workers’ wages. Given the divergence, we need policies that go beyond ones tried before—and that continue to not solve the problem.
To economists, the focus on skills and education unnecessarily leaves a lot of other good ideas in the shade. There are many other things we could try, and, as the economist Tony Atkinson says in his new book,Inequality: What Can Be Done?, it might be taken for granted that we would invest in people’s skills and education anyway. “The standard response to the question ‘How can we fight rising inequality?’ is to advocate increased investment in education and skills,” he writes. “I would like to highlight more radical proposals—proposals that require us to rethink fundamental aspects of our modern society and to cast off political ideas that have dominated recent decades.”
Atkinson, a senior professor at the London School of Economics, has spent a lifetime investigating inequality. He first proposed the “Atkinson Index”—a way of measuring contributions to inequality within a society—back in 1970. His new book sets out 15 concrete proposals—five of which we discuss further below—for reducing inequality. They all fall in the camp of redistributing wealth in some way, Atkinson says, but not necessarily in the ways you might think. “I start from the pragmatic concern that current levels of inequality are too high, and that this outcome in part reflects the fact that the balance of power is weighted against consumers and workers,” Atkinson writes.
One idea Atkinson explores is pay codes, where executives are bound by mandatory or voluntary ratios of pay relative to workers. For example, the Swiss have voted to impose pay controls on managers, including the right for shareholders to veto pay proposals and bans on “golden parachutes” for departing executives. In the U.K., companies have come together under a decent-pay accreditation plan run by the Living Wage Foundation (both the Chelsea Football Club and Barclays are members).
These codes help start a conversation about the distribution of income and the wider question of who gains when the economy improves. In the last 20 years, we’ve seen steadily rising productivity but wages haven’t caught up. The question is who shares in a company’s prosperity when it’s making money. In America, it hasn’t been workers, of late.
The Latest on: Reversing Income Inequality
via Google News
The Latest on: Reversing Income Inequality
- The Good Things That Can Happen When Cities and Counties Work Togetheron May 17, 2022 at 10:20 pm
Boosted by an unprecedented infusion of federal funds, they have an opportunity to bring innovative collaborative efforts to bear on issues of economic inequality and mobility that cross ...
- Australia's Gen-Z outpaced boomers' income gains during pandemicon May 17, 2022 at 5:10 pm
AUSTRALIA'S younger generation recorded stronger income growth and saved more than their older counterparts during the pandemic, reversing a long-running trend, Commonwealth Bank of Australia (CBA) ...
- Support abortion rights, free speech and health care for allon May 17, 2022 at 12:02 pm
We saw access to abortion as part of a larger fight for women’s liberation, including decent jobs, child care and health care and an end to poverty and racial discrimination.Read ...
- As globalisation enters a new phase, companies and consumers will pay the priceon May 13, 2022 at 2:58 pm
However, there is growing concern that this trend will come to an end soon, or even reverse. Perhaps ... the progress of globalisation. Growing income inequality in developed economies, such ...
- Survey: 4 in 5 in US face near-poverty, no workon May 12, 2022 at 2:45 am
saying in recent speeches that his highest priority is to “rebuild ladders of opportunity” and reverse income inequality. As nonwhites approach a numerical majority in the U.S., one question ...
- Southern Africa: Poverty and Extreme Inequality Worsen in Southern Africa As Covid-19 Battered Countries Embark On a Dangerous Austerity Pathon May 11, 2022 at 9:35 am
The COVID-19 pandemic has worsened the extreme inequality in Southern African Development Community (SADC) countries and pushed millions into poverty, reveals a new analysis from Oxfam, Norwegian ...
- Healthcare Professionals: Reversing Roe v. Wade is Dangerous and Unjuston May 6, 2022 at 8:05 pm
The Massachusetts Nurses Association Board of Directors – nurses and healthcare professionals elected by their MNA colleagues – have released the ...
- Earnings boom for bankers during pandemic fueling income inequalityon May 4, 2022 at 9:05 am
The rapid rise is the most significant since the 2008 financial crisis, says the group – and is reversing the pre-pandemic trend of falling income inequality. Average (mean) monthly pay for UK ...
- Earnings boom for bankers during pandemic fueling income inequalityon May 4, 2022 at 8:50 am
Pay for finance workers has rocketed during the pandemic and is likely to drive a larger wedge between rich and poor as the cost of living crisis deepens. That’s according to analysis by the Institute ...
via Bing News