FREQUENT visitors to the Hustler Club, a gentlemen’s entertainment venue in New York, could not have known that they would become part of a debate about anonymity in the era of “big data”.
But when, for sport, a data scientist called Anthony Tockar mined a database of taxi-ride details to see what fell out of it, it became clear that, even though the data concerned included no direct identification of the customer, there were some intriguingly clustered drop-off points at private addresses for journeys that began at the club. Stir voter-registration records into the mix to identify who lives at those addresses (which Mr Tockar did not do) and you might end up creating some rather unhappy marriages.
The anonymisation of a data record typically means the removal from it of personally identifiable information. Names, obviously. But also phone numbers, addresses and various intimate details like dates of birth. Such a record is then deemed safe for release to researchers, and even to the public, to make of it what they will. Many people volunteer information, for example to medical trials, on the understanding that this will happen.
But the ability to compare databases threatens to make a mockery of such protections. Participants in genomics projects, promised anonymity in exchange for their DNA, have been identified by simple comparison with electoral rolls and other publicly available information. The health records of a governor of Massachusetts were plucked from a database, again supposedly anonymous, of state-employee hospital visits using the same trick. Reporters sifting through a public database of web searches were able to correlate them in order to track down one, rather embarrassed, woman who had been idly searching for single men. And so on.
Each of these headline-generating stories creates a demand for more controls. But that, in turn, deals a blow to the idea of open data—that the electronic “data exhaust” people exhale more or less every time they do anything in the modern world is actually useful stuff which, were it freely available for analysis, might make that world a better place.
Of cake, and eating it
Modern cars, for example, record in their computers much about how, when and where the vehicle has been used. Comparing the records of many vehicles, says Viktor Mayer-Schönberger of the Oxford Internet Institute, could provide a solid basis for, say, spotting dangerous stretches of road. Similarly, an opening of health records, particularly in a country like Britain, which has a national health service, and cross-fertilising them with other personal data, might help reveal the multifarious causes of diseases like Alzheimer’s.
This is a true dilemma. People want both perfect privacy and all the benefits of openness. But they cannot have both. The stripping of a few details as the only means of assuring anonymity, in a world choked with data exhaust, cannot work. Poorly anonymised data are only part of the problem. What may be worse is that there is no standard for anonymisation. Every American state, for example, has its own prescription for what constitutes an adequate standard.
All these approaches, though, are anathema to the open-data movement, because they limit the scope of studies. “If we’re making it so hard to share that only a few have access,” says Tim Althoff, a data scientist at Stanford University, “that has profound implications for science, for people being able to replicate and advance your work.”
The Latest on: Data Privacy
via Google News
The Latest on: Data Privacy
- TripleBlind Secures $8.2 Million in Seed Funding, Investor Group Reflects Strong Support for Breakthrough Data Privacy Approachon March 1, 2021 at 7:32 am
All Prior Investors Exercise Pro-rata Rights, Highlights Fintech and Healthcare Industries’ Need for Private Data Sharing and Collaboration TripleBlind Improves AML Initiatives, Accelerates Creation ...
- OneTrust acquires DocuVision to automatically find and redact sensitive data in documentson March 1, 2021 at 6:45 am
OneTrust has bolstered its data privacy capabilities by acquiring DocuVision, a platform that automatically finds and redact sensitive data.
- Squire Patton Boggs Nabs BakerHostetler Data Privacy Proon February 28, 2021 at 9:02 pm
Squire Patton Boggs has broadened its already diverse data privacy and cybersecurity capabilities by picking up the chair of BakerHostetler's U.S. consumer privacy practice, who's spent nearly three ...
- Apple Vs. Facebook – Who Will Win The Data Privacy War?on February 28, 2021 at 6:45 am
Did you know the average app includes six third-party trackers that collect and share your online data? The war over data privacy continues to heat up in the tech world. Two of the world’s biggest ...
- $92M biometric data privacy suit settlement agreement reached by TikTokon February 26, 2021 at 10:21 am
A tentative deal has been reached for TikTok users to settle their biometric data privacy lawsuit against the app for $92 million.
- ByteDance reaches $92 million settlement with U.S. TikTok users over data privacy concernson February 25, 2021 at 6:05 pm
Under the proposed terms of the agreement, TikTok will no longer collect or store a user's biometric information, including facial characteristics, or track users' GPS data. The company will also be ...
- Data Privacy Consultancy Securys Expands to Pursue New Market in Irelandon February 24, 2021 at 11:23 pm
Data privacy consultancy Securys is opening in Dublin, its first office outside the UK, to serve Ireland’s growth economy.
- Data Privacy Isn’t Just An IT Issue; It’s An Organization-Wide Issueon February 24, 2021 at 4:00 am
Whether your employees are working remotely or in the office, whether they’re in marketing or operations or customer service, they’re all de facto privacy people now. So are you. Are you ready?
- Should there be tension between Data, Privacy, and Innovation? - Part 1on February 23, 2021 at 4:00 pm
Max de Pree, in Leadership, is an art Some fascinating perspectives are now front and center on the shift to digital and the opportunities and challenges associate with this transition, especi ...
- Efficiency Vs. Privacy: The Debate Over Biometric Tax Dataon February 23, 2021 at 9:32 am
Nana Ama Sarfo outlines some potential and past litigation in Mexico, the United Kingdom, and India over biometric tax rules.
via Bing News