Open access isn’t as open as you think, especially when there are corporate interests involved
Cambridge computer scientists have established a new gold standard for open research, in order to make scientific results more robust and reliable
A group of Cambridge computer scientists have set a new gold standard for openness and reproducibility in research by sharing the more than 200GB of data and 20,000 lines of code behind their latest results – an unprecedented degree of openness in a peer-reviewed publication. The researchers hope that this new gold standard will be adopted by other fields, increasing the reliability of research results, especially for work which is publicly funded.
The researchers are presenting their results at a talk today (4 May) at the 12th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI) in Oakland, California.
In recent years there’s been a great deal of discussion about so-called ‘open access’ publications – the idea that research publications, particularly those funded by public money, should be made publicly available.
Computer science has embraced open access more than many disciplines, with some publishers sub-licensing publications and allowing authors to publish them in open archives. However, as more and more corporations publish their research in academic journals, and as academics find themselves in a ‘publish or perish’ culture, the reliability of research results has come into question.
“Open access isn’t as open as you think, especially when there are corporate interests involved,” said Matthew Grosvenor, a PhD student from the University’s Computer Laboratory, and the paper’s lead author. “Due to commercial sensitivities, corporations are reluctant to make their code and data sets available when they publish in peer-reviewed journals. But without the code or data sets, the results are irrelevant – we can’t know whether an experiment is the same if we try to recreate it.”
Beyond computer science, a number of high-profile incidents of errors, fraud or misconduct have called quality standards in research into question. This has thrown the issue of reproducibility – that a result can be reliably repeated given the same conditions – into the spotlight.
“If a result cannot be reliably repeated, then how can we trust it?” said Grosvenor. “If you try to reproduce other people’s work from the paper alone, you often end up with different numbers. Unless you have access to everything, it’s useless to call a piece of research open source. It’s either open source or it’s not – you can’t open source just a little bit.”
With their most recent publication, Grosvenor and his colleagues have gone several steps beyond typical open access standards – setting a new gold standard for open and reproducible research. All of the experimental figures and tables in the award-winning final version of their paper, which describes a new method of making data centres more efficient, are clickable.
The Latest on: Open research
via Google News
The Latest on: Open research
- LSU professors and research fellow to create sensor to detect COVID-19on January 22, 2021 at 6:29 pm
BATON ROUGE, La. (BRPROUD)- LSU Biological Sciences Postdoctoral Research Fellow and immunologist Luan Vu is working with LSU Mechanical Engineering Assistant Professor Manas Gartia to create a ...
- Oklahoma research foundation tests employees weekly to keep operations runningon January 22, 2021 at 4:08 pm
So amidst this pandemic, researchers at the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation had to find a way to keep their labs open and working safely. “Just a week off for a researcher or a laboratory can set ...
- Tiny particles formed from trace gases can seed open ocean cloudson January 22, 2021 at 2:35 pm
It doesn't take much to seed a cloud in the atmosphere above the open ocean, according to a new study published Friday in the journal Nature Communications.
- Massive Open Online Courses (MOOC) Market 2021 Top Key Players, Share, Size, Evolving Technology, Trends and Industry Analysis 2026on January 22, 2021 at 11:02 am
Jan (The Expresswire) -- Global “Massive Open Online Courses (MOOC) Market” research report contains in depth information of industry by size, ...
- Open access publishing could end academic elitism in scienceon January 22, 2021 at 11:00 am
The privatization of academic publishing has perpetuated social inequality by historically deterring disadvantaged universities from accessing research.
- Recommendation of the OECD Council concerning Access to Research Data from Public Fundingon January 22, 2021 at 9:35 am
On 20 January 2021, the OECD Council adopted a revised Council Recommendation on Access to Research Data from Public Funding. The legal instrument, in force since 2006, has been updated to address new ...
- Tiny particles that seed clouds can form from trace gases over open seaon January 22, 2021 at 9:09 am
New results from an atmospheric study over the Eastern North Atlantic reveal that tiny aerosol particles that seed the formation of clouds can form out of next to nothingness over the open ocean. The ...
- Vita Fitness To Open In 106-Year-Old Wauwatosa Buildingon January 22, 2021 at 6:59 am
Mandel is restoring the historic building as part of its Crescent Apartments development, opening in early May 2021.
- Alphabet's age-fighting bet Calico has been quiet for years, but it's hiring. Here are all the open jobs open at the secretive biotech firm.on January 22, 2021 at 6:30 am
Calico has had an uptick in open roles over recent weeks as it searches for a new head of oncology and a handful of other scientists.
- Zacks Investment Research Lowers Open Lending (NASDAQ:LPRO) to Holdon January 22, 2021 at 3:11 am
Zacks Investment Research downgraded shares of Open Lending (NASDAQ:LPRO) from a buy rating to a hold rating in a report released on Tuesday morning, Zacks.com reports. According to Zacks, “Open ...
via Bing News