Whether it’s crossing disciplines, breaking down silos, or thinking outside the box, everyone’s talking about boundary spanning as the key to solving the world’s toughest problems.
So why isn’t everyone doing it?
A new study conducted by Tom Bateman, Professor of Management at the McIntire School of Commerce, and Andrew Hess, Assistant Professor of Business Administration at Washington & Lee University, offers some intriguing clues. The study, titled “Different Personal Propensities among Scientists Relate to Deeper vs. Broader Knowledge Contributions,” appeared March 2, 2015, in the prestigious Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
“We wanted to see if we could predict who would do deeper, more specialized work, and who would do broader, boundary-spanning work,” says Bateman, an expert in leadership, motivation, and decision making. “Scientific research is absolutely crucial to the health and well-being of our planet and its people—and if we want to understand how scientific progress occurs, we have to develop a better understanding of why and how researchers pursue their work in the ways that they do.”
Examining 10-year archival records of research published by some 466 medical researchers, Bateman and Hess first scored each published article according to the depth and breadth of its contribution to existing knowledge. (Conveniently, the digital archive of which they made use indicates key subject terms for every article published, enabling the objective discernment of breadth and depth.) By indexing the scored articles by author, the two were then able to assess each researcher’s publication record according to its breadth and depth.
Next, Bateman and Hess sent questionnaires to the researchers, seeking insight into key work-related behaviors and attitudes. How might factors such as an individual’s professional competitiveness or conscientiousness affect the nature of their research output? What about the individual’s fundamental attitude toward their research, as either an opportunity to learn, or an opportunity to perform? “We were able to relate the researchers’ questionnaire scores to the breadth and depth of their research,” Bateman says. “And the predictors were different for the two different types of research output.”
Their findings? Broadly speaking, highly competitive researchers were more likely to turn out highly specialized work; similarly, highly conscientious researchers, keen to follow rules and meet expectations, likewise avoided breadth. Those who regarded their work as an opportunity to perform were also more likely to produce highly specialized research—but those who regarded their work as an opportunity to learn were likely to lean toward boundary-spanning breadth.
Bateman is quick to point out that the researchers’ behaviors are only that—behaviors. “These are not necessarily deeply engrained personality traits, but behavioral workplace styles that can be changed if people decide they want to change them,” he says. “If individual researchers know what their tendencies are, they can start to think strategically about whether they want to strive for greater depth, or greater breadth,” he says. “The same point applies to research teams and research administrators, who can start thinking about how to change goals and approaches to research output.”
The Latest on: Boundary spanning
via Google News
The Latest on: Boundary spanning
- Professor Claretha Hughes Receives Academy of Human Resource Development Forward Awardon May 8, 2022 at 10:15 pm
Professor Claretha Hughes, Ph.D., M.B.A., was recently awarded the 2022 Academy of Human Resource Development's Forward Award, which recognizes "significant, pioneering, landmark and/or ...
- Giving Kuala Lumpur an iconic identityon May 5, 2022 at 5:00 pm
The project, said Mahadi, would involve the whole of Kuala Lumpur’s boundary spanning 103.3km. Forest around the city For now, 15.67km of the boundary have been identified for the tree-planting ...
- Maintaining network connectionson May 2, 2022 at 9:08 pm
Ask: Were people primarily in tight network groups? Were there people who were boundary-spanning to other groups? Did people have broad, weak ties to many others both within and outside the business?
- Being Human During COVID-19on April 27, 2022 at 8:22 am
Highlighting the lived experiences of marginalized groups from around the world, this is a boundary-spanning critical intervention to ongoing debates about the pandemic. It presents new ways of ...
- Jasmine Stuarton April 9, 2022 at 5:06 pm
I write about engineering and computer science at Concordia University’s Gina Cody School, covering the boundary-spanning work of our faculty members and students. My focus is on the impact our ...
- Collaboration in public policy and practice: Perspectives on boundary spannerson March 29, 2022 at 7:57 am
These individual actors are referred to as ‘boundary spanners’ because they engage in ‘boundary spanning’ activities that cross, weave and permeate many traditional boundary types, including ...
- Michael Valoson November 30, 2020 at 3:09 pm
A Deakin University ‘boundary spanning academic’, Michael facilitates engagement between marketers and rigorous and robust peer-reviewed academic research. Michael is the winner of a number of ...
- Katherine Adams, Ph.D.on November 17, 2020 at 1:43 am
My research interests are in the areas of boundary spanning, higher education trends, community engagement, college homelessness, and student research communication. I am an associate editor for the ...
- What Is a Boundary Spanner in Public Relations?on July 28, 2018 at 4:59 am
Boundary spanning is a largely academic term for developing external relationships in order to accomplish your business objectives. This can be accomplished in business by such acts as joining an ...
- Supply Chain Managementon January 7, 2018 at 7:29 am
Due to the boundary-spanning nature of supply chain management, the SCM course also has strong links to the first-year courses in marketing, leadership, and strategy. The course emphasizes the ...
via Bing News