THE process by which academics check the work of their colleagues before it goes to print—peer review, in the argot—is nearly as old as scientific publishing itself. But like every human endeavour, it is fraught with human frailties and the process can be hijacked in a variety of ways.
As a result, and as with many other aspects of publishing, peer review is the subject of much experimentation. One upstart publisher is trying to codify good behaviour.
Peer review’s current incarnation took shape in the middle of the 20th century: authors submit a manuscript to a publisher, who then seeks out academics suitable to comment on it; they then submit critiques anonymously to the authors, who amend the work to reflect the critiques. The system nearly works. The reasons for anonymity are manifold, but that information asymmetry often causes trouble, with reviewers shooting down rivals’ work, pinching ideas, or just plain dragging their feet (overwhelmingly, reviewing is unpaid).
There are a few green shoots of innovation in the field, though. One idea is to remove the veil and carry out peer review publicly: reviewers’ identities and their reports are published online for all to see. Proponents reckon this provides incentives for both honesty and courtesy. Faculty of 1000, an online biology and medicine publisher, has taken this tack with F1000 Research, its flagship journal.
Indeed it is taking the idea further. Michael Markie, an associate publisher for F1000 Research, believes that a commitment to change must also come from authors and reviewers, not just journal editors and publishers. Mr Markie was a co-author of a paper—itself the subject of fervent open peer-review—which proposed a kind of oath and a set of guidelines to encourage even-handed and helpful behaviours for reviewers. The oath reads
Principle 1: I will sign my name to my review
Principle 2: I will review with integrity
Principle 3: I will treat the review as a discourse with you; in particular, I will provide constructive criticism
Principle 4: I will be an ambassador for the practice of open science
Faculty of 1000 has begun to encourage reviewers to cite the oath in their reports, in the hope that other publishers will adopt the practice as well. Already, Pensoft Publishers and the Journal of Open Research Software are following suit.
The Latest on: Open peer review
via Google News
The Latest on: Open peer review
- ACP and AHA partner on new open access journal-Annals of Internal Medicine: Clinical Caseson April 15, 2021 at 10:00 am
The American College of Physicians (ACP), publisher of Annals of Internal Medicine (Annals), one of the most influential peer-reviewed ...
- CommerceHealthcare® Receives HFMA Peer Review Designationon April 12, 2021 at 11:58 am
The Healthcare Financial Management Association (HFMA) recently reviewed three CommerceHealthcare® products, AP Card, RemitConnect® and Health Services Financing (HSF®), using the Peer Review process.
- A guide to Plan S: the open-access initiative shaking up science publishingon April 8, 2021 at 10:19 am
As the first papers under these mandates are published, Plan S supporters say it’s the start of a journey towards open science. But most research funders haven’t signed up yet, and negotiations over ...
- The MIT Press launches MIT Open Publishing Serviceson April 6, 2021 at 1:40 pm
MIT Open Publishing Services (MITops), working with its partner the Knowledge Futures Group, provides a portfolio of services to mission-aligned partners, including peer review support and editorial ...
- InterSystems joins Gartner Peer Insights Customer First programon April 6, 2021 at 10:00 am
We believe that the Customer First badge validates our commitment to our customers and the importance of open lines ... The Gartner Peer Insights Customer First program constitutes an organization's ...
- Hip-hop professor looks to open doors with world's first peer-reviewed rap albumon March 15, 2021 at 7:04 am
(THE CONVERSATION) As a rap artist who is also a professor of hip-hop, I always make it a point to have my songs reviewed by other artists I admire. So when I released “i used to love to dream ...
- Hip-hop professor looks to open doors with world's first peer-reviewed rap albumon March 15, 2021 at 6:35 am
My album – which is free and open source – deals with topics that ... “The press’s standard peer review questions consider purpose, organization, and audience,” the University of ...
- BMJ Openon August 10, 2020 at 2:49 pm
Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
- Pros and cons of open peer reviewon November 16, 2019 at 4:48 pm
Advocates of open review argue that openness will force ... The BMJ claims that, since it opened up its peer-review process, only a small percentage (about 2%) of referees have refused to review ...
via Bing News