The deliberate, large-scale intervention in the Earth’s climate system is not a “quick fix” for global warming, according to the findings of the UK’s first publicly funded studies on geoengineering.
The results of three projects – IAGP, led by the University of Leeds; SPICE, led by the University of Bristol; and CGG, led by the University of Oxford – are announced at an event held at The Royal Society, London, on 26 November 2014.
Professor Piers Forster, Professor of Physical Climate Change at the University of Leeds, and the principal investigator of the Integrated Assessment of Geoengineering Proposals (IAGP) project, said: “Our research shows that the devil is in the detail. Geoengineering will be much more expensive and challenging than previous estimates suggest and any benefits would be limited.
“For example, when simulating the spraying of sea salt particles into clouds to try to brighten them, we found that only a few clouds were susceptible and that the particles would tend to coagulate and fall out before reaching the cloud base.”
In September 2009, The Royal Society published a report, Geoengineering the climate: science, governance and uncertainty. It influenced research worldwide, identified important gaps and called for a major UK funding programme into geoengineering. The IAGP and SPICE projects were funded the next year, and the CGG project followed in 2012.
IAGP is the UK’s first interdisciplinary research study into the controversial issue of geoengineering. It has brought together a range of expertise – climate modelling, philosophy and engineering – in addition to understanding public perceptions, to assess geoengineering within wider societal values.
“Cleverly designed simulations create less necessity for real-world testing.. My favourite part of the research involved creating a virtual reality in which we tried to rescue Arctic sea ice by dumping sulphur dioxide into the atmosphere from Stratotanker aircraft flying out of Svalbard in Norway,” said Professor Forster.
“Issues around monitoring and predicting the effects of our actions led to huge indecision and highlighted how challenging it would be to ever try and deploy these techniques in the real world.”
Researchers working on the Stratospheric Particle Injection for Climate Engineering (SPICE) project took a different tack, but came to a similar cautionary conclusion.
Rather than running simulations, SPICE researchers used volcanoes as models to mimic the effect of a solar geoengineering proposal, in which sulphate aerosols are pumped into the atmosphere to reflect more sunlight back into space. This is a process that also naturally occurs due to particles emitted from volcanic eruptions.
Dr Matthew Watson, a reader in natural hazards from the University of Bristol, and principal investigator for the SPICE project, said: “Whilst it is clear that temperatures could be reduced during deployment, the potential for misstep is considerable. By identifying risks, we hope to contribute to the evidence base around geoengineering that will determine whether deployment, in the face of the threat of climate change, has the capacity to do more good than harm.”
The Latest on: Geoengineering
via Google News
The Latest on: Geoengineering
- What Is Geoengineering, and How Does It Impact Climate Change?on March 3, 2021 at 11:10 am
Geoengineering refers to the manipulation of Earth's natural climate processes. Learn how geoengineering is conducted and its impact on the climate.
- Fact Check: Is Bill Gates Trying to Block the Sun?on March 2, 2021 at 7:28 am
Billionaire philanthropist and Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates is no stranger to conspiracy theories and speculation about the projects he funds. Twitter users claim Gates' involvement with a solar ...
- Carbon capture can't solve the climate problem without individual actionson February 28, 2021 at 4:00 pm
Geoengineering projects focused on reducing greenhouse gas emissions like large-scale tree planting, carbon removal, and carbon storage may mitigate climate change, but not without the widespread ...
- A first-of-its-kind geoengineering experiment is about to take its first stepon February 20, 2021 at 5:57 am
Harvard scientists plan to launch a balloon this summer to test the equipment needed for the first geoengineering experiments in the stratosphere. Trapped inside a long glass tube in a ground ...
- If we start and stop geoengineering, Earth could heat up faston February 19, 2021 at 4:00 pm
A proposed method of geoengineering that sprays tiny sulfur-based particles into the upper atmosphere to reflect sunlight could exacerbate the effects of climate change if it is implemented and ...
- Solar geoengineering: Could reflecting away the sun’s rays help to tackle global heating?on February 12, 2021 at 7:12 am
“Solar geoengineering” is the name given to this set of technologies. Ideas for reflecting away more of the sun’s rays range from painting buildings bright white to sending giant mirrors ...
- We Won’t Know If Solar Geoengineering Is Workingon February 9, 2021 at 8:11 am
In a perfect world, solar geoengineering would be a cheap and easy way to adjust the planet’s temperature. If things are getting too hot, you’d send up airplanes to spray sulfur particles ...
- Outstanding reportage from the front lines of geoengineeringon February 8, 2021 at 6:59 am
These cascades of geoengineering are the subject of the latest book from Elizabeth Kolbert, Pulitzer-prizewinning environment reporter at The New Yorker. Under The White Sky looks at what people are ...
- Balloon test flight plan under fire over solar geoengineering fearson February 7, 2021 at 10:30 pm
Stratospheric aerosols are a key component of solar geoengineering technology that some have proposed as a plan B for controlling the Earth’s temperature if the climate crisis makes conditions ...
via Bing News