The solution to global warming, Olaf Schuiling says, lies beneath our feet.
For Dr. Schuiling, a retired geochemist, climate salvation would come in the form of olivine, a green-tinted mineral found in abundance around the world. When exposed to the elements, it slowly takes carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.
Olivine has been doing this naturally for billions of years, but Dr. Schuiling wants to speed up the process by spreading it on fields and beaches and using it for dikes, pathways, even sandboxes. Sprinkle enough of the crushed rock around, he says, and it will eventually remove enough CO2 to slow the rise in global temperatures.
“Let the earth help us to save the earth,” said Dr. Schuiling, who has been pursuing the idea single-mindedly for several decades and at 82 is still writing papers on the subject from his cluttered office at the University of Utrecht.
Once considered the stuff of wild-eyed fantasies, such ideas for countering climate change — known as geoengineering solutions, because they intentionally manipulate nature — are now being discussed seriously by scientists. The National Academy of Sciences is expected to issue a report on geoengineering later this year.
That does not mean that such measures, which are considered controversial across the political spectrum, are likely to be adopted anytime soon. But the effects of climate change may become so severe that geoengineering solutions could attract even more serious consideration. Some scientists say significant research should begin now.
Dr. Schuiling’s idea is one of several intended to reduce levels of CO2, the main greenhouse gas, so the atmosphere will trap less heat. Other approaches, potentially faster and more doable but riskier, would create the equivalent of a sunshade around the planet by scattering reflective droplets in the stratosphere or spraying seawater to create more clouds over the oceans. Less sunlight reaching the earth’s surface would mean less heat to be trapped, resulting in a quick lowering of temperatures.
No one can say for sure whether geoengineering of any kind would work. And many of the approaches are seen as highly impractical. Dr. Schuiling’s, for example, would take decades to have even a small impact, and the processes of mining, grinding and transporting the billions of tons of olivine needed would produce enormous carbon emissions of their own.
Beyond the practicalities, many people view the idea of geoengineering as abhorrent — a last-gasp, Frankenstein-like approach to climate change that would distract the world from the goal of eliminating the emissions that are causing the problem in the first place. The climate is a vastly complex system, so manipulating temperatures may also have consequences, like changes in rainfall, that could be catastrophic or benefit one region at the expense of another.
Critics also worry that geoengineering could be used unilaterally by one nation, creating another source of geopolitical worries, or could aggravate tensions between rich and poor nations over who causes and who suffers from climate change. Even conducting research on some of these ideas, they say, risks opening a Pandora’s box.
The Latest on: Climate engineering
[google_news title=”” keyword=”Climate engineering” num_posts=”10″ blurb_length=”0″ show_thumb=”left”]
via Google News
The Latest on: Climate engineering
- Carbon removal is needed to achieve net zero but has its own climate riskson December 6, 2023 at 1:59 pm
Carbon capture and sequestration can play a role in limiting warming but the nuances of its application are far more complicated than just planting trees. Getting it wrong could make warming worse.
- UPenn students compile dossier of antisemitic events leading to ‘climate of fear’ on campuson December 6, 2023 at 12:14 pm
Numerous demonstrations — allegedly headed by “Penn Students Against the Occupation,” recognized as an official club by the university — have left students at the Philadelphia-based Ivy League ...
- Why dimming the Sun would be an effective tool in the fight against climate changeon December 6, 2023 at 7:53 am
Releasing reflective particles into the upper atmosphere would help us tackle climate change – but it’s not without risk.
- How chemical and process engineers are addressing climate changeon December 6, 2023 at 4:00 am
ITN Business launches news-style programme ‘Engineering a Sustainable World’ exploring the role chemical and process engineers are playing in addressing climate change, the importance of collaboration ...
- The urgent need to humanize engineeringon December 6, 2023 at 2:00 am
If we want to attract and keep women in the engineering profession, we need to focus on why we build, not just what we build.
- Climate and Environmenton December 5, 2023 at 3:26 am
High interest rates make green start-up costs soar. Officials at the U.N. climate summit fear the world could miss an opportunity to avert future greenhouse gas emissions. By Jim Tankersley and ...
- Comment: A global climate change emergency statement for COP28on December 2, 2023 at 4:01 am
Humanity is conducting an unintended, uncontrolled, globally pervasive experiment whose ultimate consequence could be second only to a global nuclear war.” ...
- A new UN report lays out an ethical framework for climate engineeringon December 1, 2023 at 4:00 am
The report’s release, which coincides with COP28, weighs the ethics of using technological interventions to mitigate climate change.
- COP28 climate conference begins with controversy and early financial breakthroughon November 30, 2023 at 10:46 pm
After facing renewed criticism for his deep ties to the oilpatch on the eve of hosting the world’s largest ever climate summit, the president of COP28 scored an early victory on Thursday with a ...
- Climate engineeringon November 30, 2023 at 4:00 pm
As greenhouse gas emissions continue to rise, climate engineering, including carbon dioxide removal and management of solar radiation, presents an opportunity to mitigate the disastrous effects of ...
via Bing News