Some scientists share better than others. While astronomers and geneticists embrace the concept, the culture of ecology still has a ways to go.
Research by Michigan State University, published in the current issue of Bioscience, explores the paradox that although ecologists share findings via scientific journals, they do not share the data on which the studies are built, said Patricia Soranno, MSU fisheries and wildlife professor and co-author of the paper.
“One reason for not sharing data is the fear of being scooped by another scientist; but if all data are available, then everyone is on the same playing field, there are more people to collaborate with, and you will have a bigger impact on science,” said Soranno, an MSU AgBioResearch scientist. “Think of the advances being made in genomics, for example, due to the human genome project and the free-flowing findings and data. Genomics is advancing at an unprecedented rate, and it’s having an impact on many other fields as well.”
The paper’s co-authors and the diverse fields they represent exemplify this new era for sharing in ecology and many other fields. The team comprised MSU researchers from the Lyman Briggs College, including Kendra Cheruvelil, fisheries and wildlife; Kevin Elliott, a philosopher in fisheries and wildlife; and Georgina Montgomery, history.
While many environmental scientists support the notion of sharing, the vast majority of them do not carry out their good intentions, according to a recent survey. Even with calls from funding organizations, scientific journals and even the White House, it’s still yet to instill sharing as a matter of practice, Montgomery said.
“If you advocate for inclusion in science, if you believe scientists should be engaged with the public and decision makers in policy, then you should walk the walk and share your data,” she said. “Collaboration, rather than competition, is the best way to continue to advance science.”
To improve the current culture, the team argues that increased data sharing will allow more diverse people to actively participate in research, such as early-career scientists and those from underrepresented groups; scientists from smaller or historically less-influential institutions; citizen-scientists; and scientists from the Global South, scientists from Africa, South and Central America, and much of Asia who are often excluded from leading research.
The culture is beginning to change, but now it’s time to find ways to implement it, Cheruvelil added.
The Latest on: Scientific sharing
via Google News
The Latest on: Scientific sharing
- HighTower Advisors LLC Has $34.10 Million Stock Position in Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (NYSE:TMO)on March 2, 2021 at 9:02 pm
HighTower Advisors LLC lifted its position in Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (NYSE:TMO) by 19.1% in the fourth quarter, according to the company in its most recent 13F filing with the Securities & ...
- Scientific Industries Inc. (SCND) Upgraded to Buy: What Does It Mean for the Stock?on March 2, 2021 at 9:52 am
Scientific Industries Inc. (SCND) has been upgraded to a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy), reflecting growing optimism about the company's earnings prospects. This might drive the stock higher in the near term.
- Rossmore Private Capital Sells 112 Shares of Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (NYSE:TMO)on March 2, 2021 at 8:24 am
Rossmore Private Capital lowered its stake in Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (NYSE:TMO) by 2.3% during the fourth quarter, Holdings Channel reports. The institutional investor owned 4,838 shares of the ...
- Alimentiv Announces Acquisition of McDougall Scientific Ltd.on March 2, 2021 at 7:11 am
Alimentiv Health Trust, the parent company of Alimentiv, Inc. (formerly Robarts Clinical Trials), a specialized ...
- Scientific Games offers positive glimpse of future, reveals IGT dealon March 2, 2021 at 5:05 am
Scientific Games executives, during a Monday earnings call with investors, touted the company’s money management, improved free cash flow and revamped R&D department as highlights in a ...
- IGT and Scientific Games agree to share cashless gaming technology patentson March 2, 2021 at 2:07 am
International Game Technology (IGT) and Scientific Games have partnered to deliver cashless gaming technologies to the US gaming industry.
- Scientific Games (SGMS) Reports Q4 Loss, Tops Revenue Estimateson March 1, 2021 at 5:59 pm
Scientific Games (SGMS) delivered earnings and revenue surprises of -51.28% and 5.99%, respectively, for the quarter ended December 2020. Do the numbers hold clues to what lies ahead for the stock?
- Scientific Games Co. (NASDAQ:SGMS) Expected to Announce Earnings of -$0.39 Per Shareon March 1, 2021 at 4:27 pm
Wall Street brokerages expect Scientific Games Co. (NASDAQ:SGMS) to post ($0.39) earnings per share for the current fiscal quarter, according to Zacks. Six analysts have issued estimates for ...
- Semler Scientific Inc. (SMLR) Q4 Earnings and Revenues Top Estimateson March 1, 2021 at 3:35 pm
S emler Scientific Inc. (SMLR) came out with quarterly earnings of $0.66 per share, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $0.45 per share. This compares to earnings of $0.35 per share a year ago.
- Scientific Games: 4Q Earnings Snapshoton March 1, 2021 at 2:53 pm
Scientific Games Corp. (SGMS) on Monday reported a loss of $90 million in its fourth quarter.On a per-share basis, the Las Vegas-based company said it had a loss of 95 cents. Losses, adjusted for ...
via Bing News