Increasing administrative requirements waste researcher time and taxpayer money
Excessive regulations are consuming scientists’ time and wasting taxpayer dollars, says a report released today by the National Science Board (NSB), the policymaking body of the National Science Foundation and advisor to Congress and the President.
“Regulation and oversight of research are needed to ensure accountability, transparency and safety,” said Arthur Bienenstock, chair of the NSB task force that examined the issue. “But excessive and ineffective requirements take scientists away from the bench unnecessarily and divert taxpayer dollars from research to superfluous grant administration. This is a real problem, particularly in the current budget climate.”
Thousands of federally funded scientists responded to NSB’s request to identify requirements they believe unnecessarily increase their administrative workload. The responses raised concerns related to financial management, grant proposal preparation, reporting, personnel management, and institutional review boards and animal care and use committees (IRBs and IACUCs).
Scientists and institutions pinpointed regulations they believe are ineffective or inappropriately applied to research, and audit and compliance activities that take away research time and result in university over-regulation.
“Escalating compliance requirements and inconsistent audit practices directly impact scientists and the time they have to perform research and train students and staff,” said Kelvin Droegemeier, NSB vice chairman and a member of the task force.
The report, Reducing Investigators’ Administrative Workload for Federally Funded Research, recommends limiting proposal requirements to those essential to evaluate merit; keeping reporting focused on outcomes; and automating payroll certification for effort reporting. The NSB further recommends an evaluation of animal research, conflict of interest, and safety and security requirements, and encourages universities to review their IRB and IACUC processes to achieve rapid approval of protocols.
The report cites a continued lack of consistency in requirements within and between federal agencies and recommends the creation of a permanent high-level, inter-agency, inter-sector committee. The committee would address the recommendations in the NSB and other reports; identify and prioritize, with stakeholder engagement, additional opportunities to streamline and harmonize regulations; and, help standardize the implementation of new requirements affecting investigators and institutions.
“Streamlining research regulations and making requirements more consistent across federal agencies is in the best interest of scientists and taxpayers,” said Bienenstock.
The Latest on: Excessive scientific regulation
via Google News
The Latest on: Excessive scientific regulation
- The Future of CBD research, marketing, and regulationon August 1, 2022 at 6:24 am
In this interview, Professor Ted Dinan, Medical Director at Atlantia Clinical Trials, and Asa Waldstein, Principal at Supplement Advisory Group, discuss Atlantia’s expertise in clinical trials for CBD ...
- Insects Might Feel Pain. Should Scientists Care?on July 30, 2022 at 1:29 pm
To Chittka, these observations defy a long-held view that insects are robotlike, controlled by hardwired cognitive programs. Rather, bees’ behavior seems to be influenced by subjective experience—a ...
- End of baldness? Scientists spot key chemical that could spur hair growthon July 28, 2022 at 9:49 am
Not only do hair follicles have stem cell reservoirs, but they can also regenerate periodically and without the need for an injury.
- The seaweed startup world needs to slow downon July 27, 2022 at 7:06 pm
these products will not exist if our industry does not pay equal attention to scientific research, regulations, and stakeholder coalition-building. We run the risk of falling short on the very ...
- Legalizing Cannabis at the Federal Level Could Benefit Public Health. Here’s Whyon July 27, 2022 at 3:09 am
New research suggests that decriminalizing cannabis at the federal level could help mitigate the sales of high-potency cannabis products, which may be harmful to overall health. According to experts, ...
- Public Health ‘Authority’? Pleaseon July 26, 2022 at 9:40 pm
Top Covid hawk Andy Slavitt forgets his expertise when confronted by monkeypox, a gay male disease spread primarily by sex ...
- If insects feel pain, should we reconsider how we experiment on them?on July 26, 2022 at 6:00 pm
Some scientists want to grant more invertebrates ethical consideration, questioning long-held assumptions on consciousness.
- Stricter regulations needed to properly manage vicious dogs in Vietnamon July 25, 2022 at 3:30 am
It is quite easy and simple to purchase a fierce dog breed such as pit bulls in Vietnam, but current regulations seem to be. There are many groups for pit bull owners and traders on Facebook, ...
- Embryonic Research Could Be the Next Target After Roeon July 20, 2022 at 4:00 am
Stem cell research has underpinned IVF’s success, but legal experts, clinicians, and potential donors worry about its future.
via Bing News