As a range of climate change mitigation scenarios are discussed, Univ. of Washington researchers have found that the injection of sulfate particles into the atmosphere to reflect sunlight and curb the effects of global warming could pose a severe threat if not maintained indefinitely and supported by strict reductions in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.
The new study, published Feb. 18, 2014, in IOP Publishing’s journal Environmental Research Letters, has highlighted the risks of large and spatially expansive temperature increases if solar radiation management (SRM) is abruptly stopped once it has been implemented.
SRM is a proposed method of geoengineering whereby tiny sulfate-based aerosols are released into the upper atmosphere to reflect sunlight and cool the planet. The technique has been shown to be economically and technically feasible; however, its efficacy depends on its continued maintenance, without interruption from technical faults, global cooperation breakdown or funding running dry.
According to the study, global temperature increases could more than double if SRM is implemented for a multi-decadal period of time and then suddenly stopped, in relation to the temperature increases expected if SRM was not implemented at all.
The researchers used a global climate model to show that if an extreme emissions pathway—RCP8.5—is followed up until 2035, allowing temperatures to rise 1 C above the 1970–1999 mean, and then SRM is implemented for 25 years and suddenly stopped, global temperatures could increase by 4 C in the following decades.
This rate of increase, caused by the build-up of background greenhouse gas emissions, would be well beyond the bounds experienced in the last century and more than double the 2 C temperature increase that would occur in the same timeframe if SRM had not been implemented.
On a regional and seasonal scale, the temperature changes would be largest in an absolute sense in winter over high latitude land, but compared to historical fluctuations, temperature changes would be largest in the tropics in summertime, where there is usually very little variation.
Lead author of the research, Kelly McCusker, from the Univ. of Washington, said: “According to our simulations, tropical regions like South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa are hit particularly hard, the very same regions that are home to many of the world’s most food insecure populations. The potential temperature changes also pose a severe threat to biodiversity.”
The Latest on: Geoengineering
via Google News
The Latest on: Geoengineering
- Give research into solar geoengineering a chanceon May 12, 2021 at 4:38 am
There is no substitute for aggressive cuts in greenhouse-gas emissions. But the risks and benefits of technologies that could mitigate global warming need to be evaluated.
- A Science-Fiction Solution to Climate Change?on May 11, 2021 at 1:47 pm
Dr. Peter Frumhoff weighs in on a controversial idea for slowing down global warming: shooting particles into the atmosphere to cool the planet.
- Even Research Into Tinkering With the Sky to Fight Climate Change Needs Public Supporton May 11, 2021 at 11:45 am
Unprecedented wildfires, storms, and floods make it clear that climate change has arrived. And as climate change worsens, there is growing interest in researching solar geoengineering—a cluster of ...
- Blocking Out The Sun: Viable Climate Countermeasure Or Absolute Madness?on May 9, 2021 at 5:00 pm
Other geoengineering techniques aim to help cool the Earth, too. Marine cloud brightening aims to also reflect more sunlight, but from a lower level of the atmosphere, while cloud thinning aims to ...
- Simulated geoengineering evaluation: cooler planet, but with side effectson May 7, 2021 at 6:03 am
A new modeling study led by two NOAA researchers highlights the vast challenges and potentially damaging consequences of solar geoengineering actions large enough to ward off extreme warming by the ...
- Response of the Indian summer monsoon to global warming, solar geoengineering and its terminationon May 7, 2021 at 3:27 am
The response of the Indian Summer Monsoon (ISM) to global warming, solar geoengineering and its termination is examined using the multi-model mean of seven global climate model simulations from G2 ...
- Geoengineering Is Coming, Whether It’s Governed or Noton May 6, 2021 at 5:00 pm
Humanity’s collective failure to reduce greenhouse gas emissions is driving the world inexorably toward geoengineering, or the intentional, large-scale human manipulation of Earth’s climate ...
- Here are some climate engineering schemes that can act as 'Plan B' for Earthon April 29, 2021 at 11:41 pm
Dismissed a decade ago as far-fetched and dangerous, schemes to tame the effects of global warming by engineering the climate have migrated from the margins of policy debates towards centre stage.
- Geoengineering: 'Plan B' for the planeton April 29, 2021 at 11:40 am
That has opened the door to a host of geoengineering schemes, from building underwater walls to shore up an Antarctic glacier the size of Britain to injecting a giant sunscreen into the stratosphere.
- Can Solar Geoengineering Be Used as a Weapon?on April 29, 2021 at 9:47 am
Blog posts represent the views of CFR fellows and staff and not those of CFR, which takes no institutional positions. The following is a guest post by Joshua Horton, research director ...
via Bing News