As a range of climate change mitigation scenarios are discussed, Univ. of Washington researchers have found that the injection of sulfate particles into the atmosphere to reflect sunlight and curb the effects of global warming could pose a severe threat if not maintained indefinitely and supported by strict reductions in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.
The new study, published Feb. 18, 2014, in IOP Publishing’s journal Environmental Research Letters, has highlighted the risks of large and spatially expansive temperature increases if solar radiation management (SRM) is abruptly stopped once it has been implemented.
SRM is a proposed method of geoengineering whereby tiny sulfate-based aerosols are released into the upper atmosphere to reflect sunlight and cool the planet. The technique has been shown to be economically and technically feasible; however, its efficacy depends on its continued maintenance, without interruption from technical faults, global cooperation breakdown or funding running dry.
According to the study, global temperature increases could more than double if SRM is implemented for a multi-decadal period of time and then suddenly stopped, in relation to the temperature increases expected if SRM was not implemented at all.
The researchers used a global climate model to show that if an extreme emissions pathway—RCP8.5—is followed up until 2035, allowing temperatures to rise 1 C above the 1970–1999 mean, and then SRM is implemented for 25 years and suddenly stopped, global temperatures could increase by 4 C in the following decades.
This rate of increase, caused by the build-up of background greenhouse gas emissions, would be well beyond the bounds experienced in the last century and more than double the 2 C temperature increase that would occur in the same timeframe if SRM had not been implemented.
On a regional and seasonal scale, the temperature changes would be largest in an absolute sense in winter over high latitude land, but compared to historical fluctuations, temperature changes would be largest in the tropics in summertime, where there is usually very little variation.
Lead author of the research, Kelly McCusker, from the Univ. of Washington, said: “According to our simulations, tropical regions like South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa are hit particularly hard, the very same regions that are home to many of the world’s most food insecure populations. The potential temperature changes also pose a severe threat to biodiversity.”
The Latest on: Geoengineering
via Google News
The Latest on: Geoengineering
- Amazon Is Quietly Researching How to Block Out the Sunon December 2, 2021 at 8:40 am
Amazon has partnered with climate scientists to help create models that show what exactly would happen if we blocked the Sun.
- Climate Scientist Warns That Countries Are Going to Start Geoengineering the Earthon December 1, 2021 at 11:27 am
A climate scientist believes that since geoengineering the earth to cool down the climate is so affordable, countries will inevitably start doing it.
- Think Climate Change Is Messy? Wait Until Geoengineeringon November 30, 2021 at 5:00 am
Someone's bound to hack the atmosphere to cool the planet. So we urgently need more research on the consequences, says climate scientist Kate Ricke.
- Another Life: Are the risks of geoengineering worth bearing?on November 28, 2021 at 6:23 am
As the climate crisis stirs deeper global anxiety, the risks and costs of some forms of geoengineering may come to seem worth bearing. Geoengineering looks at ways of using the planet’s natural ...
- The perils of making rules for climate manipulationon November 25, 2021 at 11:45 am
Many ideas for technologies to combat global warming by intervening in planetary systems — sometimes called geoengineering — are still in the research phase. But with climate change already taking ...
- WATCH: Solar Geoengineering – can it counter climate change?on November 25, 2021 at 6:42 am
There’s no doubt whatsoever that humans can artificially cool the planet,” David Keith, a Harvard professor, who is researching how to modify solar radiation in the atmosphere, told DW. So far, ...
- Before geoengineering, some fundamental chemistryon November 22, 2021 at 8:37 pm
“These fundamental insights highlight the importance of understanding the photochemistry involved in geoengineering,” says Joseph S. Francisco, an atmospheric chemist in Penn’s School of Arts & ...
- Before geoengineering to mitigate climate change, researchers must consider some fundamental chemistryon November 22, 2021 at 12:28 pm
"These fundamental insights highlight the importance of understanding the photochemistry involved in geoengineering," says Joseph S. Francisco, an atmospheric chemist in Penn's School of Arts ...
- Before geoengineering, some fundamental chemistryon November 22, 2021 at 11:30 am
“These fundamental insights highlight the importance of understanding the photochemistry involved in geoengineering,” says Joseph S. Francisco, an atmospheric chemist in Penn’s School of ...
- Climate change: Before geoengineering, some fundamental chemistryon November 21, 2021 at 4:00 pm
New research examines the chemistry of a proposal to curb climate change's effects -- creating a sunshade in the upper atmosphere made of sulfuric acid -- and finds that there's more work to do to ...
via Bing News