
Mean surface temperature change for 1999–2008 relative to the average temperatures from 1940 to 1980 (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
As a range of climate change mitigation scenarios are discussed, Univ. of Washington researchers have found that the injection of sulfate particles into the atmosphere to reflect sunlight and curb the effects of global warming could pose a severe threat if not maintained indefinitely and supported by strict reductions in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.
The new study, published Feb. 18, 2014, in IOP Publishing’s journal Environmental Research Letters, has highlighted the risks of large and spatially expansive temperature increases if solar radiation management (SRM) is abruptly stopped once it has been implemented.
SRM is a proposed method of geoengineering whereby tiny sulfate-based aerosols are released into the upper atmosphere to reflect sunlight and cool the planet. The technique has been shown to be economically and technically feasible; however, its efficacy depends on its continued maintenance, without interruption from technical faults, global cooperation breakdown or funding running dry.
According to the study, global temperature increases could more than double if SRM is implemented for a multi-decadal period of time and then suddenly stopped, in relation to the temperature increases expected if SRM was not implemented at all.
The researchers used a global climate model to show that if an extreme emissions pathway—RCP8.5—is followed up until 2035, allowing temperatures to rise 1 C above the 1970–1999 mean, and then SRM is implemented for 25 years and suddenly stopped, global temperatures could increase by 4 C in the following decades.
This rate of increase, caused by the build-up of background greenhouse gas emissions, would be well beyond the bounds experienced in the last century and more than double the 2 C temperature increase that would occur in the same timeframe if SRM had not been implemented.
On a regional and seasonal scale, the temperature changes would be largest in an absolute sense in winter over high latitude land, but compared to historical fluctuations, temperature changes would be largest in the tropics in summertime, where there is usually very little variation.
Lead author of the research, Kelly McCusker, from the Univ. of Washington, said: “According to our simulations, tropical regions like South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa are hit particularly hard, the very same regions that are home to many of the world’s most food insecure populations. The potential temperature changes also pose a severe threat to biodiversity.”
The Latest on: Geoengineering
via Google News
The Latest on: Geoengineering
- Carbon Capture Can’t Solve the Climate Problem Without Individual Actionson February 25, 2021 at 5:13 am
Individual choices like the adoption of electric vehicles are going to factor heavily in meeting the climate objectives of the Paris Agreement.
- If we start and stop geoengineering, Earth could heat up faston February 19, 2021 at 4:00 pm
A proposed method of geoengineering that sprays tiny sulfur-based particles into the upper atmosphere to reflect sunlight could exacerbate the effects of climate change if it is implemented and ...
- A first-of-its-kind geoengineering experiment is about to take its first stepon February 19, 2021 at 6:45 am
Harvard scientists plan to launch a balloon this summer to test the equipment needed for the first geoengineering experiments in the stratosphere.
- Tucson Opinion: Government can help, but it's time to let the market loose on carbonon February 17, 2021 at 4:00 pm
I agree with a number of points which Chris Reed makes in his Feb. 15 op-ed on global warming and geoengineering. Aside from nuclear proliferation, global warming is probably the most dire ongoing ...
- Dimming the Skyon February 17, 2021 at 4:00 pm
But the method, called solar geoengineering, comes with some serious risks. Given the grim reality of the climate crisis, some scientists are seeking to artificially manipulate the environment to ...
- DIMMING THE SUN: Bill Gates and other Family Office Owners Allocate Capital to Solar Geoengineeringon February 17, 2021 at 12:11 pm
Solar geoengineering refers to proposed approaches to cool the Earth by reflecting solar radiation back to space. Some of these experimental ideas range from sending a giant mirror into space to ...
- Greens who object to geoengineering put planet at riskon February 14, 2021 at 2:05 am
Apocalyptic warnings about climate change — such as the U.S. Geological Survey-Cornell-University of Arizona report in 2014 that the American Southwest faced a significant risk of a 35-year ...
- Geoengineering: What could possibly go wrong? Elizabeth Kolbert’s take, in her new bookon February 11, 2021 at 3:01 am
Kolbert’s new book, Under a White Sky, explores the ways that humanity is attempting to engineer, fix, or reroute nature in a climate-changed world.
- We Won’t Know If Solar Geoengineering Is Workingon February 9, 2021 at 8:11 am
In a perfect world, solar geoengineering would be a cheap and easy way to adjust the planet’s temperature. If things are getting too hot, you’d send up airplanes to spray sulfur particles ...
- Outstanding reportage from the front lines of geoengineeringon February 8, 2021 at 6:59 am
These cascades of geoengineering are the subject of the latest book from Elizabeth Kolbert, Pulitzer-prizewinning environment reporter at The New Yorker. Under The White Sky looks at what people are ...
via Bing News