When individuals engage in risky business transactions with each other, they may end up being disappointed.
This is why they’d rather leave the decision on how to divvy up jointly-owned monies to a computer than to their business partner. This subconscious strategy seems to help them avoid the negative emotions associated with any breaches of trust. This is the result of a study by scientists from the University of Bonn and US peers. They are presenting their findings in the scientific journal “Proceedings of the Royal Society B.”
Trust is an essential basis for business relationships. However, this basis can be shaken if one business partner exhibits dishonest behavior. “Everyone knows that trust can be shattered in risky businesses,” explained Prof. Dr. Bernd Weber from the Center for Economics and Neuroscience (CENs) at the University of Bonn. “As a result, people are not all that eager to put their trust in others.” Scientists call this attitude “betrayal aversion” – people try to avoid being disappointed by potential breaches of trust.
In a current study, Prof. Weber and his US colleagues, Prof. Dr. Jason A. Aimone from Baylor University and Prof. Dr. Daniel Houser from George Mason University examined in experiments the effects betrayal aversion has on simple financial decisions. A total of 30 subjects played a computer game at George Mason University in Arlington, VA (USA) that promised real monies to the winners. At the Life & Brain Zentrum of the University of Bonn, the same number of subjects then made their decisions based on the results of the earlier experiment. And while the Bonn subjects were responding to their gaming partners’ decisions made earlier in Arlington, their brain activity was measured by means of MRI scans.
Sharing fairly or making a profit at the other person’s expense?
In this experiment, the test subjects in Bonn were able to select whether they and their US partners would get one euro each only, or whether they wanted to have a higher amount – i.e., 6 euros – divided up. However, the latter variant came with a risk. So, for example, the other player might get as much as 5.60 euros while the Bonn player would be left with only 40 Cents. The actual dividing of the amount, which came in a second step, could be left either to one’s partner or to the computer. However, the computer gave out exactly the same decisions as the real test subjects. “So, from the point of view of winnings, there was no difference whether the other player or the machine divided the amount,” explained Prof. Weber. “And the subjects had explicitly been told so from the very start.”
Even though the winnings were exactly the same in the end, more subjects put their trust into the computer. When the money was divided by the computer, 63 percent of subjects trusted the process and only 37 percent preferred taking just the one euro. But if the arrangement was that the human partners would make the decision, only 49 percent of test subjects trusted them – 51 percent would rather take the more secure, small amount. “These results show that more subjects prefer to leave risky decisions in which they may be betrayed to an impersonal device, thus avoiding the negative feeling that comes from having wrongly trusted a human,” said Prof. Weber, adding that obviously a breach of trust committed by an impersonal computer was less emotionally stressful than if had been a private business partner.
The brain’s frontal insula was especially active
The University of Bonn’s subjects also showed interesting brain activities as measured in MRI scans. In the process of making financial decisions, the frontal insula was especially active when it was another player who made the decision on how to divide the amount. “This area of the brain is always involved when negative emotions such as pain, disappointment or fear are activated,” explained Prof. Weber. He added that the fact that the frontal insula was activated is a clear indication that negative emotions played an important role in these situations.
Financial decisions are very complex. “This is a very contrary phenomenon. Many studies show that the anonymity of business partners on the Internet results in a loss of trust,” said Prof. Weber. “But our results indicate that this anonymity can also help avoid negative feelings.” He added that these decision processes in financial transactions would yet have to be studied in more detail.
The Latest on: Letting Computers Decide
via Google News
The Latest on: Letting Computers Decide
- Readers React: Let citizens set non-partisan election districtson March 5, 2021 at 6:47 am
Reader: Anytime today’s politicians use computer software to decide voting districts it is probable they are scheming to gain favor for someone.
- Concerns over biased algorithms grow as computers make more decisionson February 23, 2021 at 3:59 pm
Stanford's vaccine debacle is only one example of the many ways algorithms can be biased, a problem that's becoming more visible as computer programs take the place of human decision makers.
- Microsoft's Your Phone app will soon let you change your phone's settingson February 18, 2021 at 10:51 am
The Your Phone app will soon have the option to control certain settings on your smartphone from your PC. You'll be able to change your smartphone's Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and other settings with the app.
- How to Change a Drive Letter in Windows 10on February 17, 2021 at 2:34 pm
You can hide a specific drive from all apps on your computer ... You can choose from the remaining A-Z letters from the menu. Click “OK.” Windows will not let you know that apps that are ...
- LastPass Free will soon cover your phones or your PCs, but not bothon February 16, 2021 at 9:07 am
The free version of LastPass will let people use the service on phones or computers for free, but not both. Free users can choose if they want to use the service on phones or computers for free.
- Best computers in 2021: Which desktop PC alternative is right for you?on February 15, 2021 at 1:24 pm
A colleague from Southern California (let's call him Bob ... replacing a big old PC with an equally massive new one, why not choose one of these four alternatives? These days, most new laptops ...
- Kim Komando: How often should you be rebooting your computer?on February 13, 2021 at 10:10 pm
If your computer is still running slow, this one insider trick could definitely help.So, how often should you be rebooting your computer? Let’s take ... select Choose what the power buttons ...
- True or false: You should reboot your computer every dayon February 13, 2021 at 3:09 pm
So, how often should you be rebooting your computer? Let’s take a look at how rebooting ... or laptop, select Choose what the power buttons do. Next to When I press the power button, select ...
- How to choose a computeron February 11, 2021 at 7:59 pm
Here’s how to choose a computer that’s just right for you ... if you pick parts that aren’t compatible, PCPartPicker will let you know. Once you pick your parts, we have a number of helpful ...
- Dell discounts the perfect home office desktop computer by over $300on February 9, 2021 at 5:42 am
To make sure your home office's desktop computer can keep up with your daily tasks, you should buy the Dell Vostro 3000, which is currently on sale at $314 off.
via Bing News