Majority wants both punishment for tax evaders and things to go fine for themselves
In most modern states, central institutions are funded by public taxation. This means, however, that tax evaders must also be punished. Once such a system has been established, it is also good for the community: it makes co-existence easier and it helps maintain common standards. However, such advantageous institutions do not come about by themselves. The community must first agree that such a common punishment authority makes sense and decide what powers it should be given. Climate protection is a case in point, demonstrating that this cannot always be achieved. But how can a community agree on sensible institutions and self-limitations?
The Max Planck researchers allowed participants in a modified public goods game to decide whether to pay taxes towards a policing institution with their starting capital. They were additionally able to pay money into a common pot. The total paid in was then tripled and paid out to all participants. If taxes had been paid beforehand, free riders who did not contribute to the group pot were punished by the police. In the absence of taxation, however, there would be no police and the group would run the risk that no-one would pay into the common pot.
Police punishment of both free riders and tax evaders quickly established cooperative behaviour in the experiment. If, however, tax evaders were not punished, the opposite happened and the participants avoided paying taxes. Without policing, there was no longer any incentive to pay into the group pot, so reducing the profits for the group members. Ultimately, each individual thus benefits if tax evaders are punished.
But can participants foresee this development? To find out, the scientists gave the participants a choice: they were now able to choose individually whether they joined a group in which the police also punish tax evaders. Alternatively, they could choose a group in which only those participants who did not pay into the common pot were penalised. Faced with this choice, the majority preferred a community without punishment for tax evaders – with the result that virtually no taxes were paid and, subsequently, that contributions to the group pot also fell.
In a second experimental scenario, the players were instead able to decide by democratic vote whether, for all subsequent rounds, the police should be authorised to punish tax evaders as well as free riders or only free riders. In this case, the players clearly voted for institutions in which tax evaders were also punished. “People are often prepared to impose rules on themselves, but only if they know that these rules apply to everyone,” summarises Christian Hilbe, the lead author of the study. A majority decision ensures that all participants are equally affected by the outcome of the vote. This makes it easier to introduce rules and institutions which, while demanding individual sacrifice, are best for the group.
The Latest on: Democracy
via Google News
The Latest on: Democracy
- These Photos And Videos Of Pro-Democracy Protests In Russia Are Shockingly Intenseon January 23, 2021 at 1:27 pm
Last updated on January 23, 2021, at 5:07 p.m. ET Posted on January 23, 2021, at 2:59 p.m. ET Thousands of Russians across 200 cities spanning from Moscow to Siberia braved sub-zero temperatures and ...
- Biden proclaims a New Democracyon January 23, 2021 at 3:14 am
Joseph Robinette Biden Jr. earned an important and honorable place in our nation’s history on Wednesday simply by raising his hand and taking the oath of office. He thus ended a catastrophic interlude ...
- Op-Ed: How subtle changes in language helped erode U.S. democracy — and mirrored the Nazi eraon January 23, 2021 at 3:05 am
Historical observations about language used in the Nazi era mirror our Trumpian time. The list includes lies about stolen victory, hate group slogans and plenty of superlatives.
- News deserts, democracy, discord and the free presson January 22, 2021 at 2:23 pm
We face an attack on our democracy and on truth …” The best defense against such attacks is a free press. A strong network of local newspapers makes democracy stronger and more resilient. It’s a ...
- We Need a Fundamental Reset.' Shoshana Zuboff on Building an Internet That Lets Democracy Flourishon January 22, 2021 at 12:16 pm
S hoshana Zuboff, author of The Age of Surveillance Capitalism, argues the threat to our democracy won’t recede unless we address the fundamental flaws of the business model that companies like Google ...
- Big Tech's Business Model Is a Threat to Democracy. Here's How to Build a Fairer Digital Futureon January 22, 2021 at 12:15 pm
Under President Joe Biden, tech reform will take on a new, almost existential urgency for American democracy. With the new Congress, his Administration can set the terms to regulate an industry that, ...
- It's John Brennan's Authoritarianism That Threatens Democracyon January 22, 2021 at 4:08 am
Every time former CIA Director John Brennan appears on cable news to warn America about some new "insidious threat to democracy," I am reminded again that he deserves to be in federal prison. In this ...
- The place that helped inspire American democracyon January 22, 2021 at 3:59 am
In the scenic Finger Lakes region of upstate New York, there's a rich heritage of democracy and women's rights alongside iconic eateries and artistic havens.
- Trump proved it's time for America to learn from other countries about how democracy should work, experts sayon January 21, 2021 at 3:13 pm
"If you're interested in democracy, don't look at American democracy — especially not right now — on how to have a good democracy," one expert said.
- Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal says democracy was close to "being overthrown" in January 6 attackon January 21, 2021 at 2:57 pm
Washington Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal said President Trump "incited an insurrection on the U.S. Capitol" on January 6.
via Bing News