Majority wants both punishment for tax evaders and things to go fine for themselves
In most modern states, central institutions are funded by public taxation. This means, however, that tax evaders must also be punished. Once such a system has been established, it is also good for the community: it makes co-existence easier and it helps maintain common standards. However, such advantageous institutions do not come about by themselves. The community must first agree that such a common punishment authority makes sense and decide what powers it should be given. Climate protection is a case in point, demonstrating that this cannot always be achieved. But how can a community agree on sensible institutions and self-limitations?
The Max Planck researchers allowed participants in a modified public goods game to decide whether to pay taxes towards a policing institution with their starting capital. They were additionally able to pay money into a common pot. The total paid in was then tripled and paid out to all participants. If taxes had been paid beforehand, free riders who did not contribute to the group pot were punished by the police. In the absence of taxation, however, there would be no police and the group would run the risk that no-one would pay into the common pot.
Police punishment of both free riders and tax evaders quickly established cooperative behaviour in the experiment. If, however, tax evaders were not punished, the opposite happened and the participants avoided paying taxes. Without policing, there was no longer any incentive to pay into the group pot, so reducing the profits for the group members. Ultimately, each individual thus benefits if tax evaders are punished.
But can participants foresee this development? To find out, the scientists gave the participants a choice: they were now able to choose individually whether they joined a group in which the police also punish tax evaders. Alternatively, they could choose a group in which only those participants who did not pay into the common pot were penalised. Faced with this choice, the majority preferred a community without punishment for tax evaders – with the result that virtually no taxes were paid and, subsequently, that contributions to the group pot also fell.
In a second experimental scenario, the players were instead able to decide by democratic vote whether, for all subsequent rounds, the police should be authorised to punish tax evaders as well as free riders or only free riders. In this case, the players clearly voted for institutions in which tax evaders were also punished. “People are often prepared to impose rules on themselves, but only if they know that these rules apply to everyone,” summarises Christian Hilbe, the lead author of the study. A majority decision ensures that all participants are equally affected by the outcome of the vote. This makes it easier to introduce rules and institutions which, while demanding individual sacrifice, are best for the group.
The Latest on: Democracy
via Google News
The Latest on: Democracy
- Biden administration calls on Russia to free jailed opposition leader Navalny as well as pro-democracy protesterson January 25, 2021 at 11:04 pm
The Biden administration's line on Russia is contrasting sharply with his predecessor's hand-off approach.
- Exclusive: Hong Kong police obtain financial records of arrested democracy activistson January 25, 2021 at 9:08 pm
Hong Kong authorities are scrutinizing the financial records of pro-democracy activists as they crack down on political opposition, according to some activists and a senior bank executive. Six ...
- Misguided constitutional amendment is bad for our democracyon January 25, 2021 at 9:00 pm
As if recent efforts by Republican legislators to overturn Pennsylvania’s certified electoral votes weren’t bad enough, the majority party in the Pennsylvania General Assembly is at it again — ...
- Are Egypt's dreams of democracy still alive?on January 25, 2021 at 6:18 pm
It's been 10 years since Egyptians took to the streets to unseat their longest-serving President, Hosni Mubarak.
- Robert Reich: So CEOs Care About Democracy Now? Give Me a Break | Opinionon January 25, 2021 at 1:49 pm
For years, big corporations have been assaulting democracy with big money, drowning out the voices and needs of ordinary Americans—fueling much of the anger that opened the door to Trump in the first ...
- Hawley Accuses Dems Of Being Anti-Democracy After Trying To Throw Out Biden Voteson January 25, 2021 at 8:20 am
Josh Hawley (R-MO) invoked the ironclad “I know you are, but what am I?” defense on Monday with a formal demand for an ethics investigation into the Democratic senators who requested an investigation ...
- Josh Hawley Is Endangering U.S. Democracy, Warns Missouri's Biggest Newspaperon January 25, 2021 at 6:45 am
The senator has "twisted truth and logic" as one of a band of Trump supporters who defy reality, according to an editorial in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch.
- Our democracy demands an investment in civic educationon January 25, 2021 at 1:00 am
Over the course of nearly six decades, the prioritization of a few subjects (STEM and English language arts, especially) has led to a neglect of American history and civics.
- Biden wants unity and democracy. But in the US these have always been in conflicton January 24, 2021 at 11:01 pm
Its institutions were designed to keep the people out. The new president could have blamed the founding fathers, says professor of politics David Runciman ...
- Pence and McConnell helped save democracy — after helping to endanger iton January 24, 2021 at 6:31 pm
Vice President Mike Pence, then-Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and others who did the right thing at the very end — but not until the very end? The Inauguration Day tableau on the West Front ...
via Bing News