Stanford scientists break the record for thinnest light-absorber

These four wafers contain the thinnest light-absorber layer ever built. Photo: Mark Shwartz

Stanford University scientists have created the thinnest, most efficient absorber of visible light on record.

The nanosized structure, thousands of times thinner than an ordinary sheet of paper, could lower the cost and improve the efficiency of solar cells, according to the scientists. Their results are published in the current online edition of the journal Nano Letters.

“Achieving complete absorption of visible light with a minimal amount of material is highly desirable for many applications, including solar energy conversion to fuel and electricity,” said Stacey Bent, a professor of chemical engineering at Stanford and co-author of the study. “Our results show that it is possible for an extremely thin layer of material to absorb almost 100 percent of incident light of a specific wavelength.”

Thinner solar cells require less material and therefore cost less. The challenge for researchers is to reduce the thickness of the cell without compromising its ability to absorb and convert sunlight into clean energy.

For the study, the Stanford team created thin wafers dotted with trillions of round particles of gold. Each gold nanodot was about 14 nanometers tall and 17 nanometers wide.

Visible spectrum

An ideal solar cell would be able to absorb the entire visible light spectrum, from violet light waves 400 nanometers long to red waves 700 nanometers in length, as well as invisible ultraviolet and infrared light. In the experiment,Hagglund and his colleagues were able to tune the gold nanodots to absorb only visible, reddish-orange light waves about 600 nanometers long.

“Much like a guitar string, which has a resonance frequency that changes when you tune it, metal particles have a resonance frequency that can be fine-tuned to absorb a particular wavelength of light,” said postdoctoral scholar CarlHagglund, lead author of the study. “We tuned the optical properties of our system to maximize the light absorption.”

The gold nanodot-filled wafers were fabricated at a nearby Hitachi facility using a technique called block-copolymer lithography. Each wafer contained about 520 billion nanodots per square inch. Under the microscope, the hexagonal array of particles was reminiscent of a honeycomb.

Hagglund’s team added a thin-film coating on top of the wafers using a process called atomic layer deposition. “It’s a very attractive technique, because you can coat the particles uniformly and control the thickness of the film down to the atomic level, “ he said. “That allowed us to tune the system simply by changing the thickness of the coating around the dots. People have built arrays like this, but they haven’t tuned them to the optimal conditions for light absorption. That’s one novel aspect of our work.”

Record results

The results were record setting. “The coated wafers absorbed 99 percent of the reddish-orange light,” Hagglund said. “We also achieved 93 percent absorption in the gold nanodots themselves. The volume of each dot is equivalent to a layer of gold just 1.6 nanometers thick, making it the thinnest absorber of visible light on record – about 1,000 times thinner than commercially available thin film solar cell absorbers.”

The previous record-holder required an absorber layer three times thicker to reach total light absorption, he added.  “So we’ve substantially pushed the limits of what can be achieved for light harvesting by optimizing these ultrathin, nanoengineered systems,” Hagglund said.

Solar cell applications

The next step for the Stanford team is to demonstrate that visible light waves can actually be converted into useful forms of energy.  “We are now looking at building structures using ultrathin semiconductor materials that can absorb sunlight,” said Bent, co-director of the Stanford Center on Nanostructuring for Efficient Energy Conversion (CNEEC). “These prototypes will then be tested to see how efficiently we can achieve solar energy conversion.”

Read more . . .